Birdwatch Archive

Birdwatch Note

2023-07-08 01:18:12 UTC - MISINFORMED_OR_POTENTIALLY_MISLEADING

The threads in the screenshot does exist, however the person posting them does not have any role at meta, but was instead trolling. They had previously worked at BuzzFeed. https://www.dexerto.com/entertainment/who-is-katie-notopoulos-troll-threads-editor-goes-viral-with-controversial-post-2202845/

Written by 15456E0248FF67C0286B80B2149F34577D220279D1AF4F7B8CCEA2BE79E68148
Participant Details

Original Tweet

Tweet embedding is no longer reliably available, due to the platform's instability (in terms of both technology and policy). If the Tweet still exists, you can view it here: https://twitter.com/foo_bar/status/1677373569658150912

Please note, though, that you may need to have your own Twitter account to access that page. I am currently exploring options for archiving Tweet data in a post-API context.

All Information

  • ID - 1677487212026544129
  • noteId - 1677487212026544129
  • participantId -
  • noteAuthorParticipantId - 15456E0248FF67C0286B80B2149F34577D220279D1AF4F7B8CCEA2BE79E68148 Participant Details
  • createdAtMillis - 1688779092210
  • tweetId - 1677373569658150912
  • classification - MISINFORMED_OR_POTENTIALLY_MISLEADING
  • believable -
  • harmful -
  • validationDifficulty -
  • misleadingOther - 0
  • misleadingFactualError - 1
  • misleadingManipulatedMedia - 0
  • misleadingOutdatedInformation - 1
  • misleadingMissingImportantContext - 1
  • misleadingUnverifiedClaimAsFact - 0
  • misleadingSatire - 1
  • notMisleadingOther - 0
  • notMisleadingFactuallyCorrect - 0
  • notMisleadingOutdatedButNotWhenWritten - 0
  • notMisleadingClearlySatire - 0
  • notMisleadingPersonalOpinion - 0
  • trustworthySources - 1
  • summary
    • The threads in the screenshot does exist, however the person posting them does not have any role at meta, but was instead trolling. They had previously worked at BuzzFeed. https://www.dexerto.com/entertainment/who-is-katie-notopoulos-troll-threads-editor-goes-viral-with-controversial-post-2202845/

Note Status History

createdAt timestampMillisOfFirstNonNMRStatus firstNonNMRStatus timestampMillisOfCurrentStatus currentStatus timestampMillisOfLatestNonNMRStatus mostRecentNonNMRStatus participantId
2023-07-08 01:18:12 UTC
(1688779092210)
1969-12-31 23:59:59 UTC
(-1)
2023-07-09 17:10:50 UTC
(1688922650332)
NEEDS_MORE_RATINGS 1969-12-31 23:59:59 UTC
(-1)

Note Ratings

rated at rated by
2023-07-08 06:18:28 -0500 Rating Details
2023-07-08 05:20:34 -0500 Rating Details
2023-07-08 04:38:32 -0500 Rating Details
2023-07-08 04:14:18 -0500 Rating Details
2023-07-07 20:27:18 -0500 Rating Details
2023-07-08 23:51:15 -0500 Rating Details