Birdwatch Archive

Birdwatch Note

2023-07-07 19:30:28 UTC - MISINFORMED_OR_POTENTIALLY_MISLEADING

The claim "Scotland's drug crisis will not be improved by decriminalisation" is a statement of fact, not of belief ("I believe...") or opinion ("I think"). A body of evidence which shows decriminalisation could improve the situation is sufficient to prove this claim false. https://academic.oup.com/bjc/article-abstract/50/6/999/404023

Written by 4EE1489DFB0582D998E8C24DD5F93E9E96002A243B4F74E07CE6631DD80A26D7
Participant Details

Original Tweet

Tweet embedding is no longer reliably available, due to the platform's instability (in terms of both technology and policy). If the Tweet still exists, you can view it here: https://twitter.com/foo_bar/status/1677275657884037121

Please note, though, that you may need to have your own Twitter account to access that page. I am currently exploring options for archiving Tweet data in a post-API context.

All Information

  • ID - 1677399701530746897
  • noteId - 1677399701530746897
  • participantId -
  • noteAuthorParticipantId - 4EE1489DFB0582D998E8C24DD5F93E9E96002A243B4F74E07CE6631DD80A26D7 Participant Details
  • createdAtMillis - 1688758228086
  • tweetId - 1677275657884037121
  • classification - MISINFORMED_OR_POTENTIALLY_MISLEADING
  • believable -
  • harmful -
  • validationDifficulty -
  • misleadingOther - 0
  • misleadingFactualError - 0
  • misleadingManipulatedMedia - 0
  • misleadingOutdatedInformation - 0
  • misleadingMissingImportantContext - 1
  • misleadingUnverifiedClaimAsFact - 1
  • misleadingSatire - 0
  • notMisleadingOther - 0
  • notMisleadingFactuallyCorrect - 0
  • notMisleadingOutdatedButNotWhenWritten - 0
  • notMisleadingClearlySatire - 0
  • notMisleadingPersonalOpinion - 0
  • trustworthySources - 1
  • summary
    • The claim "Scotland's drug crisis will not be improved by decriminalisation" is a statement of fact, not of belief ("I believe...") or opinion ("I think"). A body of evidence which shows decriminalisation could improve the situation is sufficient to prove this claim false. https://academic.oup.com/bjc/article-abstract/50/6/999/404023

Note Status History

createdAt timestampMillisOfFirstNonNMRStatus firstNonNMRStatus timestampMillisOfCurrentStatus currentStatus timestampMillisOfLatestNonNMRStatus mostRecentNonNMRStatus participantId
2023-07-07 19:30:28 UTC
(1688758228086)
1969-12-31 23:59:59 UTC
(-1)
2023-07-08 02:11:28 UTC
(1688782288297)
NEEDS_MORE_RATINGS 1969-12-31 23:59:59 UTC
(-1)

Note Ratings

rated at rated by
2023-07-07 17:44:35 -0500 Rating Details
2023-07-07 15:24:16 -0500 Rating Details
2023-07-07 14:50:55 -0500 Rating Details
2023-07-08 07:50:05 -0500 Rating Details
2023-07-07 20:27:30 -0500 Rating Details
2023-07-07 19:39:52 -0500 Rating Details
2023-10-19 06:24:52 -0500 Rating Details