Birdwatch Archive

Birdwatch Note

2023-07-07 12:58:06 UTC - MISINFORMED_OR_POTENTIALLY_MISLEADING

Labor Minister Linda Burney has repeatedly stated that the Voice to Parliament will be a truly independent advisory body but contradicts this by also claiming she will task it to work on four key areas. If the Voice is being tasked, it's not independent. https://www.canberratimes.com.au/story/8257754/voice-to-have-a-full-in-tray-from-day-one-burney/ https://www.theaustralian.com.au/commentary/the-voice-will-be-tasked-with-taking-the-long-view-linda-burney/news-story/a66edcdad0416e8447013de4757de50a https://www.dailymail.co.uk/news/article-12269199/Voice-Parliament-Linda-Burney-four-priorities-law-Yes-vote-wins.html https://www.dailymail.co.uk/news/article-12265357/Jacinta-Nampijinpa-Price-hits-Linda-Burneys-Voice-Parliament-speech.html https://www.news.com.au/national/politics/linda-burney-reveals-first-questions-shell-ask-of-voice-to-parliament/news-story/5bb6aa6f149eacc0b823b03a05104f65 https://www.skynews.com.au/australia-news/voice-to-parliament/greg-sheridan-says-linda-burneys-claim-the-no-campaign-is-employing-trumpstyle-politics-in-voice-debate-was-just-ridiculous/news-story/459a431df9e02876bf83d7a8f028d54d

Written by 049E9E249CF132BD220934A2301413303C9F83D5CC0D861A6488BB5A903CCA42
Participant Details

Original Tweet

Tweet embedding is no longer reliably available, due to the platform's instability (in terms of both technology and policy). If the Tweet still exists, you can view it here: https://twitter.com/foo_bar/status/1677219541213134848

Please note, though, that you may need to have your own Twitter account to access that page. I am currently exploring options for archiving Tweet data in a post-API context.

All Information

  • ID - 1677300962392948736
  • noteId - 1677300962392948736
  • participantId -
  • noteAuthorParticipantId - 049E9E249CF132BD220934A2301413303C9F83D5CC0D861A6488BB5A903CCA42 Participant Details
  • createdAtMillis - 1688734686835
  • tweetId - 1677219541213134848
  • classification - MISINFORMED_OR_POTENTIALLY_MISLEADING
  • believable -
  • harmful -
  • validationDifficulty -
  • misleadingOther - 0
  • misleadingFactualError - 1
  • misleadingManipulatedMedia - 0
  • misleadingOutdatedInformation - 0
  • misleadingMissingImportantContext - 1
  • misleadingUnverifiedClaimAsFact - 1
  • misleadingSatire - 0
  • notMisleadingOther - 0
  • notMisleadingFactuallyCorrect - 0
  • notMisleadingOutdatedButNotWhenWritten - 0
  • notMisleadingClearlySatire - 0
  • notMisleadingPersonalOpinion - 0
  • trustworthySources - 1
  • summary
    • Labor Minister Linda Burney has repeatedly stated that the Voice to Parliament will be a truly independent advisory body but contradicts this by also claiming she will task it to work on four key areas. If the Voice is being tasked, it's not independent. https://www.canberratimes.com.au/story/8257754/voice-to-have-a-full-in-tray-from-day-one-burney/ https://www.theaustralian.com.au/commentary/the-voice-will-be-tasked-with-taking-the-long-view-linda-burney/news-story/a66edcdad0416e8447013de4757de50a https://www.dailymail.co.uk/news/article-12269199/Voice-Parliament-Linda-Burney-four-priorities-law-Yes-vote-wins.html https://www.dailymail.co.uk/news/article-12265357/Jacinta-Nampijinpa-Price-hits-Linda-Burneys-Voice-Parliament-speech.html https://www.news.com.au/national/politics/linda-burney-reveals-first-questions-shell-ask-of-voice-to-parliament/news-story/5bb6aa6f149eacc0b823b03a05104f65 https://www.skynews.com.au/australia-news/voice-to-parliament/greg-sheridan-says-linda-burneys-claim-the-no-campaign-is-employing-trumpstyle-politics-in-voice-debate-was-just-ridiculous/news-story/459a431df9e02876bf83d7a8f028d54d

Note Status History

createdAt timestampMillisOfFirstNonNMRStatus firstNonNMRStatus timestampMillisOfCurrentStatus currentStatus timestampMillisOfLatestNonNMRStatus mostRecentNonNMRStatus participantId
2023-07-07 12:58:06 UTC
(1688734686835)
1969-12-31 23:59:59 UTC
(-1)
2023-07-07 18:12:46 UTC
(1688753566047)
NEEDS_MORE_RATINGS 1969-12-31 23:59:59 UTC
(-1)

Note Ratings

rated at rated by
2023-07-07 10:33:36 -0500 Rating Details
2023-07-07 09:57:12 -0500 Rating Details
2023-07-07 09:36:27 -0500 Rating Details
2023-07-07 09:33:29 -0500 Rating Details
2023-07-07 08:54:42 -0500 Rating Details
2023-07-07 08:51:46 -0500 Rating Details
2023-07-07 19:10:03 -0500 Rating Details
2023-07-07 18:35:53 -0500 Rating Details
2023-07-07 18:01:48 -0500 Rating Details
2023-07-07 17:49:22 -0500 Rating Details
2023-07-07 17:10:06 -0500 Rating Details
2023-07-07 16:56:13 -0500 Rating Details
2023-07-07 16:55:21 -0500 Rating Details
2023-07-07 15:38:47 -0500 Rating Details
2023-07-07 15:31:29 -0500 Rating Details
2023-07-07 15:27:10 -0500 Rating Details
2023-07-07 15:20:12 -0500 Rating Details
2023-07-07 15:18:56 -0500 Rating Details
2023-07-07 15:17:24 -0500 Rating Details
2023-07-07 15:14:36 -0500 Rating Details
2023-07-07 15:06:59 -0500 Rating Details
2023-07-07 14:53:55 -0500 Rating Details
2023-07-07 14:53:31 -0500 Rating Details
2023-07-07 14:35:59 -0500 Rating Details
2023-07-07 14:30:04 -0500 Rating Details
2023-07-07 14:23:06 -0500 Rating Details
2023-07-07 14:11:30 -0500 Rating Details
2023-07-07 14:05:46 -0500 Rating Details
2023-07-07 14:05:40 -0500 Rating Details
2023-07-07 14:04:42 -0500 Rating Details
2023-07-07 13:37:14 -0500 Rating Details
2023-07-07 13:15:41 -0500 Rating Details
2023-07-07 13:14:19 -0500 Rating Details
2023-07-07 13:10:29 -0500 Rating Details
2023-07-07 13:07:36 -0500 Rating Details
2023-07-07 12:49:48 -0500 Rating Details
2023-07-07 12:20:55 -0500 Rating Details
2023-07-08 17:38:26 -0500 Rating Details
2023-07-08 06:38:51 -0500 Rating Details
2023-07-08 00:38:53 -0500 Rating Details
2023-07-08 00:08:47 -0500 Rating Details
2023-07-07 20:52:47 -0500 Rating Details
2023-07-08 20:41:31 -0500 Rating Details
2023-07-12 04:20:40 -0500 Rating Details
2023-07-11 20:24:57 -0500 Rating Details
2023-08-13 20:38:05 -0500 Rating Details