Birdwatch Archive

Birdwatch Note

2023-07-06 21:59:47 UTC - NOT_MISLEADING

NNN. The data from the linked study in Enterprising Desert Raven's Community Note re: fertility show the opposite effect before adjustment: https://boriquagato.substack.com/p/purr-review-wesselink-study-on-covid The proposed CN also posits an opinion that "peer review is ethical", which is debatable and would be better suited as a comment. https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC1420798/

Written by 9EC0688AA7F8991C1462EBDDCFA1636CCF2636985940E789988A460B9A275ABA
Participant Details

Original Tweet

Tweet embedding is no longer reliably available, due to the platform's instability (in terms of both technology and policy). If the Tweet still exists, you can view it here: https://twitter.com/foo_bar/status/1676981798914367489

Please note, though, that you may need to have your own Twitter account to access that page. I am currently exploring options for archiving Tweet data in a post-API context.

All Information

  • ID - 1677074893974941696
  • noteId - 1677074893974941696
  • participantId -
  • noteAuthorParticipantId - 9EC0688AA7F8991C1462EBDDCFA1636CCF2636985940E789988A460B9A275ABA Participant Details
  • createdAtMillis - 1688680787925
  • tweetId - 1676981798914367489
  • classification - NOT_MISLEADING
  • believable -
  • harmful -
  • validationDifficulty -
  • misleadingOther - 0
  • misleadingFactualError - 0
  • misleadingManipulatedMedia - 0
  • misleadingOutdatedInformation - 0
  • misleadingMissingImportantContext - 0
  • misleadingUnverifiedClaimAsFact - 0
  • misleadingSatire - 0
  • notMisleadingOther - 0
  • notMisleadingFactuallyCorrect - 0
  • notMisleadingOutdatedButNotWhenWritten - 0
  • notMisleadingClearlySatire - 0
  • notMisleadingPersonalOpinion - 1
  • trustworthySources - 1
  • summary
    • NNN. The data from the linked study in Enterprising Desert Raven's Community Note re: fertility show the opposite effect before adjustment: https://boriquagato.substack.com/p/purr-review-wesselink-study-on-covid The proposed CN also posits an opinion that "peer review is ethical", which is debatable and would be better suited as a comment. https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC1420798/

Note Status History

createdAt timestampMillisOfFirstNonNMRStatus firstNonNMRStatus timestampMillisOfCurrentStatus currentStatus timestampMillisOfLatestNonNMRStatus mostRecentNonNMRStatus participantId
2023-07-06 21:59:47 UTC
(1688680787925)
1969-12-31 23:59:59 UTC
(-1)
2023-07-07 18:12:46 UTC
(1688753566047)
NEEDS_MORE_RATINGS 1969-12-31 23:59:59 UTC
(-1)

Note Ratings

rated at rated by
2023-07-07 10:33:36 -0500 Rating Details
2023-07-07 10:27:05 -0500 Rating Details
2023-07-07 10:18:29 -0500 Rating Details
2023-07-07 09:37:54 -0500 Rating Details
2023-07-07 09:25:45 -0500 Rating Details
2023-07-07 08:55:40 -0500 Rating Details
2023-07-07 08:43:26 -0500 Rating Details
2023-07-07 08:33:21 -0500 Rating Details
2023-07-07 08:32:34 -0500 Rating Details
2023-07-07 08:14:10 -0500 Rating Details
2023-07-07 07:34:12 -0500 Rating Details
2023-07-07 05:00:25 -0500 Rating Details
2023-07-07 00:35:35 -0500 Rating Details
2023-07-07 00:06:55 -0500 Rating Details
2023-07-06 23:58:01 -0500 Rating Details
2023-07-06 23:43:52 -0500 Rating Details
2023-07-06 22:59:21 -0500 Rating Details
2023-07-06 21:53:55 -0500 Rating Details
2023-07-06 21:53:26 -0500 Rating Details
2023-07-06 19:54:56 -0500 Rating Details
2023-07-06 19:49:19 -0500 Rating Details
2023-07-06 19:06:33 -0500 Rating Details
2023-07-06 18:53:36 -0500 Rating Details
2023-07-06 18:13:07 -0500 Rating Details
2023-07-06 17:52:04 -0500 Rating Details
2023-07-06 17:51:40 -0500 Rating Details
2023-07-06 17:11:12 -0500 Rating Details
2023-07-06 17:10:45 -0500 Rating Details
2023-07-07 19:21:12 -0500 Rating Details
2023-07-07 15:41:05 -0500 Rating Details
2023-07-07 11:53:32 -0500 Rating Details
2023-07-08 06:42:01 -0500 Rating Details
2023-07-15 04:04:00 -0500 Rating Details