Birdwatch Note
2023-07-05 16:49:31 UTC - MISINFORMED_OR_POTENTIALLY_MISLEADING
The NSPCC responded to a report of an at risk child, they responded to those concerns, having assessed the situation and come to the conclusion that no action was needed. This renders the fact claim that the NSPCC are "Dismissing safeguarding concerns" false and misleading. https://twitter.com/SurrogConcern/status/1676241607400497152
Written by 4EE1489DFB0582D998E8C24DD5F93E9E96002A243B4F74E07CE6631DD80A26D7
Participant Details
Original Tweet
Tweet embedding is no longer reliably available, due to the platform's instability (in terms of both technology and policy). If the Tweet still exists, you can view it here: https://twitter.com/foo_bar/status/1676235839016239106
Please note, though, that you may need to have your own Twitter account to access that page. I am currently exploring options for archiving Tweet data in a post-API context.
All Information
- ID - 1676634421150056455
- noteId - 1676634421150056455
- participantId -
- noteAuthorParticipantId - 4EE1489DFB0582D998E8C24DD5F93E9E96002A243B4F74E07CE6631DD80A26D7 Participant Details
- createdAtMillis - 1688575771021
- tweetId - 1676235839016239106
- classification - MISINFORMED_OR_POTENTIALLY_MISLEADING
- believable -
- harmful -
- validationDifficulty -
- misleadingOther - 0
- misleadingFactualError - 1
- misleadingManipulatedMedia - 0
- misleadingOutdatedInformation - 0
- misleadingMissingImportantContext - 1
- misleadingUnverifiedClaimAsFact - 0
- misleadingSatire - 0
- notMisleadingOther - 0
- notMisleadingFactuallyCorrect - 0
- notMisleadingOutdatedButNotWhenWritten - 0
- notMisleadingClearlySatire - 0
- notMisleadingPersonalOpinion - 0
- trustworthySources - 1
- summary
- The NSPCC responded to a report of an at risk child, they responded to those concerns, having assessed the situation and come to the conclusion that no action was needed. This renders the fact claim that the NSPCC are "Dismissing safeguarding concerns" false and misleading. https://twitter.com/SurrogConcern/status/1676241607400497152
Note Status History
createdAt | timestampMillisOfFirstNonNMRStatus | firstNonNMRStatus | timestampMillisOfCurrentStatus | currentStatus | timestampMillisOfLatestNonNMRStatus | mostRecentNonNMRStatus | participantId |
2023-07-05 16:49:31 UTC (1688575771021) |
1969-12-31 23:59:59 UTC (-1) |
2023-07-06 02:08:45 UTC (1688609325745) |
NEEDS_MORE_RATINGS | 1969-12-31 23:59:59 UTC (-1) |
Note Ratings
rated at | rated by | |
2023-07-06 10:07:59 -0500 | Rating Details | |
2023-07-06 03:26:20 -0500 | Rating Details | |
2023-07-06 01:42:53 -0500 | Rating Details | |
2023-07-05 18:59:12 -0500 | Rating Details | |
2023-07-05 17:52:34 -0500 | Rating Details | |
2023-07-05 17:45:35 -0500 | Rating Details | |
2023-07-05 15:15:51 -0500 | Rating Details | |
2023-07-05 15:12:14 -0500 | Rating Details | |
2023-07-05 14:14:42 -0500 | Rating Details | |
2023-07-05 14:11:05 -0500 | Rating Details | |
2023-07-05 13:16:44 -0500 | Rating Details | |
2023-07-05 12:55:15 -0500 | Rating Details | |
2023-07-05 12:13:17 -0500 | Rating Details | |
2023-07-05 12:05:10 -0500 | Rating Details | |
2023-07-05 11:56:41 -0500 | Rating Details | |
2023-07-08 15:10:59 -0500 | Rating Details | |
2023-07-07 20:41:08 -0500 | Rating Details | |
2024-02-23 12:50:57 -0600 | Rating Details |