Birdwatch Archive

Birdwatch Note

2023-07-05 05:41:02 UTC - NOT_MISLEADING

Sie geht auf den Vorfall ein. Man kann genau erkennen das um ein vorfall geht nach seinem Stream und zwar die zweite begegnung nicht die erste. Hierzu keine Beweise was wiederum die unschuldsvermutung ist. Seine Reaktion https://youtu.be/Ilmnumq4R34 Beweist aber auch das er in ausschnitt filmt mit absicht

Written by 0A63736976EA9EAF6B8D9A289A4EA468A323073F07FC0FC603B9AE23BE89AB9D
Participant Details

Original Tweet

Tweet embedding is no longer reliably available, due to the platform's instability (in terms of both technology and policy). If the Tweet still exists, you can view it here: https://twitter.com/foo_bar/status/1676234801068515329

Please note, though, that you may need to have your own Twitter account to access that page. I am currently exploring options for archiving Tweet data in a post-API context.

All Information

  • ID - 1676466192620371969
  • noteId - 1676466192620371969
  • participantId -
  • noteAuthorParticipantId - 0A63736976EA9EAF6B8D9A289A4EA468A323073F07FC0FC603B9AE23BE89AB9D Participant Details
  • createdAtMillis - 1688535662214
  • tweetId - 1676234801068515329
  • classification - NOT_MISLEADING
  • believable -
  • harmful -
  • validationDifficulty -
  • misleadingOther - 0
  • misleadingFactualError - 0
  • misleadingManipulatedMedia - 0
  • misleadingOutdatedInformation - 0
  • misleadingMissingImportantContext - 0
  • misleadingUnverifiedClaimAsFact - 0
  • misleadingSatire - 0
  • notMisleadingOther - 0
  • notMisleadingFactuallyCorrect - 0
  • notMisleadingOutdatedButNotWhenWritten - 0
  • notMisleadingClearlySatire - 0
  • notMisleadingPersonalOpinion - 1
  • trustworthySources - 1
  • summary
    • Sie geht auf den Vorfall ein. Man kann genau erkennen das um ein vorfall geht nach seinem Stream und zwar die zweite begegnung nicht die erste. Hierzu keine Beweise was wiederum die unschuldsvermutung ist. Seine Reaktion https://youtu.be/Ilmnumq4R34 Beweist aber auch das er in ausschnitt filmt mit absicht

Note Status History

createdAt timestampMillisOfFirstNonNMRStatus firstNonNMRStatus timestampMillisOfCurrentStatus currentStatus timestampMillisOfLatestNonNMRStatus mostRecentNonNMRStatus participantId
2023-07-05 05:41:02 UTC
(1688535662214)
2023-07-05 10:11:24 UTC
(1688551884253)
CURRENTLY_RATED_NOT_HELPFUL 2023-07-06 02:08:45 UTC
(1688609325745)
NEEDS_MORE_RATINGS 2023-07-05 10:11:24 UTC
(1688551884253)
CURRENTLY_RATED_NOT_HELPFUL

Note Ratings

rated at rated by
2023-07-05 03:49:51 -0500 Rating Details
2023-07-05 02:52:06 -0500 Rating Details
2023-07-05 02:50:04 -0500 Rating Details
2023-07-05 01:51:31 -0500 Rating Details
2023-07-05 01:49:19 -0500 Rating Details
2023-07-05 01:42:35 -0500 Rating Details
2023-07-05 00:53:55 -0500 Rating Details
2023-07-07 02:26:43 -0500 Rating Details
2023-07-06 12:17:39 -0500 Rating Details
2023-07-06 08:36:02 -0500 Rating Details
2023-07-06 08:22:18 -0500 Rating Details
2023-07-06 05:25:13 -0500 Rating Details
2023-07-06 01:05:02 -0500 Rating Details
2023-07-05 20:51:35 -0500 Rating Details
2023-07-05 14:57:19 -0500 Rating Details
2023-07-05 13:06:45 -0500 Rating Details
2023-07-05 11:10:32 -0500 Rating Details
2023-07-05 08:43:23 -0500 Rating Details
2023-07-05 08:13:38 -0500 Rating Details
2023-07-05 08:06:20 -0500 Rating Details
2023-07-05 06:25:47 -0500 Rating Details
2023-07-05 06:09:19 -0500 Rating Details
2023-07-05 05:34:19 -0500 Rating Details
2023-07-05 05:16:21 -0500 Rating Details
2023-07-05 04:32:59 -0500 Rating Details
2023-07-07 16:28:53 -0500 Rating Details
2023-07-09 12:46:24 -0500 Rating Details
2023-07-09 10:27:28 -0500 Rating Details
2023-07-10 14:04:49 -0500 Rating Details
2023-07-10 01:24:19 -0500 Rating Details
2023-07-11 15:52:17 -0500 Rating Details
2023-07-11 14:35:03 -0500 Rating Details
2023-07-11 06:15:23 -0500 Rating Details
2023-07-10 22:46:01 -0500 Rating Details
2023-07-14 11:10:30 -0500 Rating Details
2023-07-16 02:04:06 -0500 Rating Details