Birdwatch Archive

Birdwatch Note

2023-07-04 13:03:24 UTC - NOT_MISLEADING

No Note Needed. The tweet describes a single piece of information obtained by the BBC but the article examines multiple points of view. The article also describes how Farage has responded to the aforementioned claims directly in an interview. BBC accuracy guidelines: https://www.bbc.com/editorialguidelines/guidelines/accuracy/guidelines

Written by 0EF79AA93C732AF02024FA736E34BB6AEC955568C8093B20530AF55CB0269522
Participant Details

Original Tweet

Tweet embedding is no longer reliably available, due to the platform's instability (in terms of both technology and policy). If the Tweet still exists, you can view it here: https://twitter.com/foo_bar/status/1676200599317106689

Please note, though, that you may need to have your own Twitter account to access that page. I am currently exploring options for archiving Tweet data in a post-API context.

All Information

  • ID - 1676215131989065728
  • noteId - 1676215131989065728
  • participantId -
  • noteAuthorParticipantId - 0EF79AA93C732AF02024FA736E34BB6AEC955568C8093B20530AF55CB0269522 Participant Details
  • createdAtMillis - 1688475804694
  • tweetId - 1676200599317106689
  • classification - NOT_MISLEADING
  • believable -
  • harmful -
  • validationDifficulty -
  • misleadingOther - 0
  • misleadingFactualError - 0
  • misleadingManipulatedMedia - 0
  • misleadingOutdatedInformation - 0
  • misleadingMissingImportantContext - 0
  • misleadingUnverifiedClaimAsFact - 0
  • misleadingSatire - 0
  • notMisleadingOther - 0
  • notMisleadingFactuallyCorrect - 1
  • notMisleadingOutdatedButNotWhenWritten - 0
  • notMisleadingClearlySatire - 0
  • notMisleadingPersonalOpinion - 0
  • trustworthySources - 1
  • summary
    • No Note Needed. The tweet describes a single piece of information obtained by the BBC but the article examines multiple points of view. The article also describes how Farage has responded to the aforementioned claims directly in an interview. BBC accuracy guidelines: https://www.bbc.com/editorialguidelines/guidelines/accuracy/guidelines

Note Status History

createdAt timestampMillisOfFirstNonNMRStatus firstNonNMRStatus timestampMillisOfCurrentStatus currentStatus timestampMillisOfLatestNonNMRStatus mostRecentNonNMRStatus participantId
2023-07-04 13:03:24 UTC
(1688475804694)
1969-12-31 23:59:59 UTC
(-1)
2023-07-05 02:12:43 UTC
(1688523163429)
NEEDS_MORE_RATINGS 1969-12-31 23:59:59 UTC
(-1)

Note Ratings

rated at rated by
2023-07-04 19:03:22 -0500 Rating Details
2023-07-04 17:59:37 -0500 Rating Details
2023-07-04 17:20:44 -0500 Rating Details
2023-07-04 16:37:01 -0500 Rating Details
2023-07-04 15:56:58 -0500 Rating Details
2023-07-04 15:09:07 -0500 Rating Details
2023-07-04 14:56:54 -0500 Rating Details
2023-07-04 14:37:33 -0500 Rating Details
2023-07-04 14:33:29 -0500 Rating Details
2023-07-04 14:32:49 -0500 Rating Details
2023-07-04 13:44:13 -0500 Rating Details
2023-07-04 13:31:28 -0500 Rating Details
2023-07-04 13:21:56 -0500 Rating Details
2023-07-04 13:15:24 -0500 Rating Details
2023-07-04 13:15:15 -0500 Rating Details
2023-07-04 13:14:14 -0500 Rating Details
2023-07-04 12:19:00 -0500 Rating Details
2023-07-04 11:23:55 -0500 Rating Details
2023-07-04 10:26:15 -0500 Rating Details
2023-07-04 09:48:42 -0500 Rating Details
2023-07-04 09:48:10 -0500 Rating Details
2023-07-04 09:46:20 -0500 Rating Details
2023-07-04 09:26:55 -0500 Rating Details
2023-07-04 09:25:05 -0500 Rating Details
2023-07-04 09:21:57 -0500 Rating Details
2023-07-04 08:56:00 -0500 Rating Details
2023-07-04 08:40:01 -0500 Rating Details
2023-07-04 08:39:31 -0500 Rating Details
2023-07-04 08:26:09 -0500 Rating Details
2023-07-04 08:19:18 -0500 Rating Details
2023-07-04 08:18:57 -0500 Rating Details
2023-07-05 03:20:07 -0500 Rating Details
2023-07-05 02:51:11 -0500 Rating Details
2023-07-05 02:34:32 -0500 Rating Details
2023-07-04 21:47:39 -0500 Rating Details
2023-07-05 12:41:43 -0500 Rating Details
2023-07-05 07:30:41 -0500 Rating Details