Birdwatch Note
2023-07-03 03:15:09 UTC - MISINFORMED_OR_POTENTIALLY_MISLEADING
The claim that the Supreme court relied on a fraudulent story in reaching their decision is untrue. The ruling and its reasoning make no mention of the hoax inquiry for service that has recently been publicized. https://supreme.justia.com/cases/federal/us/600/21-476/
Written by 3BE6E3286B2D3965870F36A1512E8D229734B1217BE516BCE9B8E456142025EC
Participant Details
Original Tweet
Tweet embedding is no longer reliably available, due to the platform's instability (in terms of both technology and policy). If the Tweet still exists, you can view it here: https://twitter.com/foo_bar/status/1675633595749404672
Please note, though, that you may need to have your own Twitter account to access that page. I am currently exploring options for archiving Tweet data in a post-API context.
All Information
- ID - 1675704704335241216
- noteId - 1675704704335241216
- participantId -
- noteAuthorParticipantId - 3BE6E3286B2D3965870F36A1512E8D229734B1217BE516BCE9B8E456142025EC Participant Details
- createdAtMillis - 1688354109258
- tweetId - 1675633595749404672
- classification - MISINFORMED_OR_POTENTIALLY_MISLEADING
- believable -
- harmful -
- validationDifficulty -
- misleadingOther - 0
- misleadingFactualError - 1
- misleadingManipulatedMedia - 0
- misleadingOutdatedInformation - 0
- misleadingMissingImportantContext - 1
- misleadingUnverifiedClaimAsFact - 0
- misleadingSatire - 0
- notMisleadingOther - 0
- notMisleadingFactuallyCorrect - 0
- notMisleadingOutdatedButNotWhenWritten - 0
- notMisleadingClearlySatire - 0
- notMisleadingPersonalOpinion - 0
- trustworthySources - 1
- summary
- The claim that the Supreme court relied on a fraudulent story in reaching their decision is untrue. The ruling and its reasoning make no mention of the hoax inquiry for service that has recently been publicized. https://supreme.justia.com/cases/federal/us/600/21-476/
Note Status History
createdAt | timestampMillisOfFirstNonNMRStatus | firstNonNMRStatus | timestampMillisOfCurrentStatus | currentStatus | timestampMillisOfLatestNonNMRStatus | mostRecentNonNMRStatus | participantId |
2023-07-03 03:15:09 UTC (1688354109258) |
1969-12-31 23:59:59 UTC (-1) |
2023-07-04 02:10:44 UTC (1688436644963) |
NEEDS_MORE_RATINGS | 1969-12-31 23:59:59 UTC (-1) |
Note Ratings
rated at | rated by | |
2023-07-03 16:05:03 -0500 | Rating Details | |
2023-07-03 15:38:28 -0500 | Rating Details | |
2023-07-03 14:52:31 -0500 | Rating Details | |
2023-07-03 13:24:48 -0500 | Rating Details | |
2023-07-03 11:51:06 -0500 | Rating Details | |
2023-07-03 10:03:27 -0500 | Rating Details | |
2023-07-03 09:44:42 -0500 | Rating Details | |
2023-07-03 09:38:28 -0500 | Rating Details | |
2023-07-03 09:09:50 -0500 | Rating Details | |
2023-07-03 08:53:27 -0500 | Rating Details | |
2023-07-03 08:40:03 -0500 | Rating Details | |
2023-07-03 08:36:23 -0500 | Rating Details | |
2023-07-03 08:05:02 -0500 | Rating Details | |
2023-07-03 07:55:39 -0500 | Rating Details | |
2023-07-03 07:40:48 -0500 | Rating Details | |
2023-07-03 06:14:54 -0500 | Rating Details | |
2023-07-03 05:32:59 -0500 | Rating Details | |
2023-07-03 04:35:16 -0500 | Rating Details | |
2023-07-03 04:32:25 -0500 | Rating Details | |
2023-07-03 04:18:30 -0500 | Rating Details | |
2023-07-03 04:15:08 -0500 | Rating Details | |
2023-07-03 03:53:02 -0500 | Rating Details | |
2023-07-03 01:32:14 -0500 | Rating Details | |
2023-07-03 01:20:05 -0500 | Rating Details | |
2023-07-03 00:56:25 -0500 | Rating Details | |
2023-07-02 23:42:44 -0500 | Rating Details | |
2023-07-02 23:15:57 -0500 | Rating Details | |
2023-07-02 22:57:51 -0500 | Rating Details | |
2023-07-02 22:41:41 -0500 | Rating Details | |
2023-07-02 22:30:51 -0500 | Rating Details | |
2023-07-02 22:25:11 -0500 | Rating Details | |
2023-07-02 22:24:17 -0500 | Rating Details | |
2023-07-02 22:21:14 -0500 | Rating Details | |
2023-07-03 23:51:58 -0500 | Rating Details | |
2023-07-03 20:42:05 -0500 | Rating Details |