Birdwatch Note
2023-07-02 01:37:47 UTC - MISINFORMED_OR_POTENTIALLY_MISLEADING
There has never been a constitutional challenge to legacy admissions, because there’s nothing in the constitution about them (as opposed to race discrimination). It’s a policy question, and the Supreme Court decides legal caeee or controversies. See Art. III, US Constitution. https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Case_or_Controversy_Clause
Written by 89C8AE69FDE5D707D24846081584734FADEC752F79D961D2C7FBDE69BD692AE0
Participant Details
Original Tweet
Tweet embedding is no longer reliably available, due to the platform's instability (in terms of both technology and policy). If the Tweet still exists, you can view it here: https://twitter.com/foo_bar/status/1674634086437072899
Please note, though, that you may need to have your own Twitter account to access that page. I am currently exploring options for archiving Tweet data in a post-API context.
All Information
- ID - 1675317815635501058
- noteId - 1675317815635501058
- participantId -
- noteAuthorParticipantId - 89C8AE69FDE5D707D24846081584734FADEC752F79D961D2C7FBDE69BD692AE0 Participant Details
- createdAtMillis - 1688261867806
- tweetId - 1674634086437072899
- classification - MISINFORMED_OR_POTENTIALLY_MISLEADING
- believable -
- harmful -
- validationDifficulty -
- misleadingOther - 1
- misleadingFactualError - 1
- misleadingManipulatedMedia - 0
- misleadingOutdatedInformation - 0
- misleadingMissingImportantContext - 1
- misleadingUnverifiedClaimAsFact - 1
- misleadingSatire - 0
- notMisleadingOther - 0
- notMisleadingFactuallyCorrect - 0
- notMisleadingOutdatedButNotWhenWritten - 0
- notMisleadingClearlySatire - 0
- notMisleadingPersonalOpinion - 0
- trustworthySources - 1
- summary
- There has never been a constitutional challenge to legacy admissions, because there’s nothing in the constitution about them (as opposed to race discrimination). It’s a policy question, and the Supreme Court decides legal caeee or controversies. See Art. III, US Constitution. https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Case_or_Controversy_Clause
Note Status History
| createdAt | timestampMillisOfFirstNonNMRStatus | firstNonNMRStatus | timestampMillisOfCurrentStatus | currentStatus | timestampMillisOfLatestNonNMRStatus | mostRecentNonNMRStatus | participantId |
| 2023-07-02 01:37:47 UTC (1688261867806) |
1969-12-31 23:59:59 UTC (-1) |
2023-07-03 02:10:07 UTC (1688350207262) |
NEEDS_MORE_RATINGS | 1969-12-31 23:59:59 UTC (-1) |
Note Ratings
| rated at | rated by | |
| 2023-07-02 11:38:33 -0500 | Rating Details | |
| 2023-07-02 01:55:40 -0500 | Rating Details | |
| 2023-07-02 00:18:17 -0500 | Rating Details | |
| 2023-07-02 00:17:55 -0500 | Rating Details | |
| 2023-07-02 00:12:42 -0500 | Rating Details | |
| 2023-07-01 23:06:11 -0500 | Rating Details | |
| 2023-07-01 22:57:11 -0500 | Rating Details | |
| 2023-07-01 22:43:59 -0500 | Rating Details | |
| 2023-07-01 22:20:58 -0500 | Rating Details | |
| 2023-07-01 22:08:47 -0500 | Rating Details | |
| 2023-07-01 21:59:01 -0500 | Rating Details | |
| 2023-07-01 20:43:09 -0500 | Rating Details | |
| 2023-07-01 20:42:07 -0500 | Rating Details | |
| 2023-07-06 18:54:50 -0500 | Rating Details |