Birdwatch Note
2023-07-01 23:12:07 UTC - MISINFORMED_OR_POTENTIALLY_MISLEADING
Havia um desacordo sobre a qualidade e desempenho do serviço prestado pelo Google Cloud. O Twitter entendeu o Google não estava honrando os compromissos acordados e por isso se recusou a pagar o valor de US$ 1 bilhão para a empresa. https://theconversation.com/twitter-is-refusing-to-pay-google-for-cloud-services-heres-why-it-matters-and-what-the-fallout-could-be-for-users-207718#:~:text=It%20seems%20Twitter%20is%20at,over%20service%20quality%20and%20performance. Porém o pagamento já foi realizado. https://www.bloomberg.com/news/articles/2023-06-21/twitter-resumes-paying-google-cloud-patching-up-relationship?utm_content=business&utm_campaign=socialflow-organic&cmpid=socialflow-twitter-business&utm_medium=social&utm_source=twitter&sref=y3YMCJ4e https://www.reuters.com/technology/twitter-resumes-paying-google-cloud-bloomberg-news-2023-06-21/
Written by 9E38E570344B672BD8CF681B7717D26FD9A7E3BADE34B9DEB556830CEFDD3B92
Participant Details
Original Tweet
Tweet embedding is no longer reliably available, due to the platform's instability (in terms of both technology and policy). If the Tweet still exists, you can view it here: https://twitter.com/foo_bar/status/1675278376460845057
Please note, though, that you may need to have your own Twitter account to access that page. I am currently exploring options for archiving Tweet data in a post-API context.
All Information
- ID - 1675281155833098247
- noteId - 1675281155833098247
- participantId -
- noteAuthorParticipantId - 9E38E570344B672BD8CF681B7717D26FD9A7E3BADE34B9DEB556830CEFDD3B92 Participant Details
- createdAtMillis - 1688253127425
- tweetId - 1675278376460845057
- classification - MISINFORMED_OR_POTENTIALLY_MISLEADING
- believable -
- harmful -
- validationDifficulty -
- misleadingOther - 0
- misleadingFactualError - 1
- misleadingManipulatedMedia - 0
- misleadingOutdatedInformation - 1
- misleadingMissingImportantContext - 1
- misleadingUnverifiedClaimAsFact - 1
- misleadingSatire - 0
- notMisleadingOther - 0
- notMisleadingFactuallyCorrect - 0
- notMisleadingOutdatedButNotWhenWritten - 0
- notMisleadingClearlySatire - 0
- notMisleadingPersonalOpinion - 0
- trustworthySources - 1
- summary
- Havia um desacordo sobre a qualidade e desempenho do serviço prestado pelo Google Cloud. O Twitter entendeu o Google não estava honrando os compromissos acordados e por isso se recusou a pagar o valor de US$ 1 bilhão para a empresa. https://theconversation.com/twitter-is-refusing-to-pay-google-for-cloud-services-heres-why-it-matters-and-what-the-fallout-could-be-for-users-207718#:~:text=It%20seems%20Twitter%20is%20at,over%20service%20quality%20and%20performance. Porém o pagamento já foi realizado. https://www.bloomberg.com/news/articles/2023-06-21/twitter-resumes-paying-google-cloud-patching-up-relationship?utm_content=business&utm_campaign=socialflow-organic&cmpid=socialflow-twitter-business&utm_medium=social&utm_source=twitter&sref=y3YMCJ4e https://www.reuters.com/technology/twitter-resumes-paying-google-cloud-bloomberg-news-2023-06-21/
Note Status History
| createdAt | timestampMillisOfFirstNonNMRStatus | firstNonNMRStatus | timestampMillisOfCurrentStatus | currentStatus | timestampMillisOfLatestNonNMRStatus | mostRecentNonNMRStatus | participantId |
| 2023-07-01 23:12:07 UTC (1688253127425) |
1969-12-31 23:59:59 UTC (-1) |
2023-07-02 02:10:08 UTC (1688263808951) |
NEEDS_MORE_RATINGS | 1969-12-31 23:59:59 UTC (-1) |
Note Ratings
| rated at | rated by | |
| 2023-07-01 19:23:20 -0500 | Rating Details | |
| 2023-07-01 19:17:53 -0500 | Rating Details | |
| 2023-07-01 19:07:42 -0500 | Rating Details | |
| 2023-07-01 19:05:16 -0500 | Rating Details | |
| 2023-07-01 18:54:46 -0500 | Rating Details | |
| 2023-07-01 18:46:20 -0500 | Rating Details | |
| 2023-07-01 18:28:04 -0500 | Rating Details | |
| 2023-07-01 18:24:19 -0500 | Rating Details | |
| 2023-07-01 18:21:12 -0500 | Rating Details | |
| 2023-07-02 11:27:28 -0500 | Rating Details | |
| 2023-07-02 09:29:58 -0500 | Rating Details | |
| 2023-07-02 09:12:33 -0500 | Rating Details | |
| 2023-07-02 09:05:06 -0500 | Rating Details | |
| 2023-07-02 08:16:25 -0500 | Rating Details | |
| 2023-07-02 08:00:26 -0500 | Rating Details | |
| 2023-07-02 06:55:28 -0500 | Rating Details | |
| 2023-07-02 06:50:34 -0500 | Rating Details | |
| 2023-07-02 05:42:44 -0500 | Rating Details | |
| 2023-07-02 05:26:13 -0500 | Rating Details | |
| 2023-07-02 03:54:48 -0500 | Rating Details | |
| 2023-07-02 01:53:58 -0500 | Rating Details | |
| 2023-07-02 01:08:40 -0500 | Rating Details | |
| 2023-07-01 23:46:34 -0500 | Rating Details | |
| 2023-07-01 22:55:53 -0500 | Rating Details | |
| 2023-07-01 22:53:54 -0500 | Rating Details | |
| 2023-07-01 22:33:44 -0500 | Rating Details | |
| 2023-07-01 22:01:31 -0500 | Rating Details | |
| 2023-07-01 21:37:07 -0500 | Rating Details | |
| 2023-07-01 21:36:32 -0500 | Rating Details | |
| 2023-07-01 21:25:50 -0500 | Rating Details | |
| 2023-07-01 21:04:45 -0500 | Rating Details | |
| 2023-07-01 20:53:47 -0500 | Rating Details | |
| 2023-07-01 20:39:36 -0500 | Rating Details | |
| 2023-07-01 20:22:31 -0500 | Rating Details | |
| 2023-07-01 20:21:19 -0500 | Rating Details | |
| 2023-07-01 20:19:46 -0500 | Rating Details | |
| 2023-07-01 19:57:19 -0500 | Rating Details | |
| 2023-07-01 19:48:35 -0500 | Rating Details | |
| 2023-07-01 19:48:16 -0500 | Rating Details | |
| 2023-07-01 19:37:25 -0500 | Rating Details | |
| 2023-07-01 19:35:04 -0500 | Rating Details | |
| 2023-07-02 19:49:22 -0500 | Rating Details | |
| 2023-07-05 05:47:29 -0500 | Rating Details |