Birdwatch Archive

Birdwatch Note

2023-07-01 23:02:34 UTC - MISINFORMED_OR_POTENTIALLY_MISLEADING

Q: SCOTUS, does the First Amendment—a part of the Constitution—bar compelled speech? A: The State "cannot compel her—in violation of the First Amendment—to create websites celebrating marriages she does not endorse." https://www.supremecourt.gov/opinions/22pdf/21-476_c185.pdf, p. 1

Written by 9221C06F8F3B11123E0A93E42B9EA2D2FFFD0D63297D07884F5B2EC98943F248
Participant Details

Original Tweet

Tweet embedding is no longer reliably available, due to the platform's instability (in terms of both technology and policy). If the Tweet still exists, you can view it here: https://twitter.com/foo_bar/status/1674826953738665994

Please note, though, that you may need to have your own Twitter account to access that page. I am currently exploring options for archiving Tweet data in a post-API context.

All Information

  • ID - 1675278750823645184
  • noteId - 1675278750823645184
  • participantId -
  • noteAuthorParticipantId - 9221C06F8F3B11123E0A93E42B9EA2D2FFFD0D63297D07884F5B2EC98943F248 Participant Details
  • createdAtMillis - 1688252554028
  • tweetId - 1674826953738665994
  • classification - MISINFORMED_OR_POTENTIALLY_MISLEADING
  • believable -
  • harmful -
  • validationDifficulty -
  • misleadingOther - 0
  • misleadingFactualError - 1
  • misleadingManipulatedMedia - 0
  • misleadingOutdatedInformation - 0
  • misleadingMissingImportantContext - 1
  • misleadingUnverifiedClaimAsFact - 0
  • misleadingSatire - 0
  • notMisleadingOther - 0
  • notMisleadingFactuallyCorrect - 0
  • notMisleadingOutdatedButNotWhenWritten - 0
  • notMisleadingClearlySatire - 0
  • notMisleadingPersonalOpinion - 0
  • trustworthySources - 1
  • summary
    • Q: SCOTUS, does the First Amendment—a part of the Constitution—bar compelled speech? A: The State "cannot compel her—in violation of the First Amendment—to create websites celebrating marriages she does not endorse." https://www.supremecourt.gov/opinions/22pdf/21-476_c185.pdf, p. 1

Note Status History

createdAt timestampMillisOfFirstNonNMRStatus firstNonNMRStatus timestampMillisOfCurrentStatus currentStatus timestampMillisOfLatestNonNMRStatus mostRecentNonNMRStatus participantId
2023-07-01 23:02:34 UTC
(1688252554028)
1969-12-31 23:59:59 UTC
(-1)
2023-07-02 02:10:08 UTC
(1688263808951)
NEEDS_MORE_RATINGS 1969-12-31 23:59:59 UTC
(-1)

Note Ratings

rated at rated by
2023-07-01 18:40:19 -0500 Rating Details
2023-07-01 18:38:48 -0500 Rating Details
2023-07-01 18:29:22 -0500 Rating Details
2023-07-01 18:07:02 -0500 Rating Details
2023-07-01 23:13:47 -0500 Rating Details
2023-07-01 22:40:16 -0500 Rating Details
2023-07-01 20:07:00 -0500 Rating Details
2023-07-03 01:00:42 -0500 Rating Details
2023-07-02 23:58:11 -0500 Rating Details