Birdwatch Archive

Birdwatch Note

2023-07-01 01:26:48 UTC - MISINFORMED_OR_POTENTIALLY_MISLEADING

The Supreme Court ruling does not say businesses can flat out refuse service to LGBTQ+ customers. Specifically, what it says is businesses can refuse to produce creative works that go against their religion. https://www.npr.org/2023/06/30/1182121291/colorado-supreme-court-same-sex-marriage-decision

Written by 8D993839EA14D05B82960BF29B3A3337BAB1DCB1103318FBBF62026463E95CBE
Participant Details

Original Tweet

Tweet embedding is no longer reliably available, due to the platform's instability (in terms of both technology and policy). If the Tweet still exists, you can view it here: https://twitter.com/foo_bar/status/1674910199960707072

Please note, though, that you may need to have your own Twitter account to access that page. I am currently exploring options for archiving Tweet data in a post-API context.

All Information

  • ID - 1674952661475663873
  • noteId - 1674952661475663873
  • participantId -
  • noteAuthorParticipantId - 8D993839EA14D05B82960BF29B3A3337BAB1DCB1103318FBBF62026463E95CBE Participant Details
  • createdAtMillis - 1688174808270
  • tweetId - 1674910199960707072
  • classification - MISINFORMED_OR_POTENTIALLY_MISLEADING
  • believable -
  • harmful -
  • validationDifficulty -
  • misleadingOther - 0
  • misleadingFactualError - 1
  • misleadingManipulatedMedia - 0
  • misleadingOutdatedInformation - 0
  • misleadingMissingImportantContext - 1
  • misleadingUnverifiedClaimAsFact - 0
  • misleadingSatire - 0
  • notMisleadingOther - 0
  • notMisleadingFactuallyCorrect - 0
  • notMisleadingOutdatedButNotWhenWritten - 0
  • notMisleadingClearlySatire - 0
  • notMisleadingPersonalOpinion - 0
  • trustworthySources - 1
  • summary
    • The Supreme Court ruling does not say businesses can flat out refuse service to LGBTQ+ customers. Specifically, what it says is businesses can refuse to produce creative works that go against their religion. https://www.npr.org/2023/06/30/1182121291/colorado-supreme-court-same-sex-marriage-decision

Note Status History

createdAt timestampMillisOfFirstNonNMRStatus firstNonNMRStatus timestampMillisOfCurrentStatus currentStatus timestampMillisOfLatestNonNMRStatus mostRecentNonNMRStatus participantId
2023-07-01 01:26:48 UTC
(1688174808270)
1969-12-31 23:59:59 UTC
(-1)
2023-07-02 02:10:08 UTC
(1688263808951)
NEEDS_MORE_RATINGS 1969-12-31 23:59:59 UTC
(-1)

Note Ratings

rated at rated by
2023-07-01 11:59:02 -0500 Rating Details
2023-07-01 11:30:51 -0500 Rating Details
2023-07-01 11:13:02 -0500 Rating Details
2023-07-01 07:23:45 -0500 Rating Details
2023-07-01 03:45:03 -0500 Rating Details
2023-07-01 03:35:09 -0500 Rating Details
2023-07-01 03:14:45 -0500 Rating Details
2023-07-01 02:02:43 -0500 Rating Details
2023-07-01 01:40:09 -0500 Rating Details
2023-07-01 00:44:26 -0500 Rating Details
2023-06-30 23:27:54 -0500 Rating Details
2023-06-30 22:58:09 -0500 Rating Details
2023-06-30 22:42:28 -0500 Rating Details
2023-06-30 22:17:58 -0500 Rating Details
2023-06-30 22:10:47 -0500 Rating Details
2023-06-30 21:58:21 -0500 Rating Details
2023-06-30 21:27:26 -0500 Rating Details
2023-06-30 21:20:02 -0500 Rating Details
2023-06-30 21:18:30 -0500 Rating Details
2023-06-30 21:16:29 -0500 Rating Details
2023-06-30 21:06:54 -0500 Rating Details
2023-06-30 21:05:07 -0500 Rating Details
2023-06-30 21:01:38 -0500 Rating Details
2023-06-30 20:59:41 -0500 Rating Details
2023-06-30 20:55:57 -0500 Rating Details
2023-06-30 20:54:50 -0500 Rating Details
2023-06-30 20:46:33 -0500 Rating Details
2023-06-30 20:41:54 -0500 Rating Details
2023-06-30 20:37:48 -0500 Rating Details
2023-06-30 20:33:12 -0500 Rating Details
2023-06-30 20:30:06 -0500 Rating Details
2023-07-01 20:14:03 -0500 Rating Details