Birdwatch Archive

Birdwatch Note

2023-06-30 21:01:45 UTC - MISINFORMED_OR_POTENTIALLY_MISLEADING

The claim that the Supreme Court granted "...business the right to refuse service to members of the LGBTQ community." is factually incorrect. The ruling was that applying a public-accommodation law to compel particular speech violates the First Amendment. https://www.nytimes.com/live/2023/06/30/us/gay-rights-free-speech-supreme-court https://www.nytimes.com/interactive/2023/06/30/us/gay-rights-first-amendment-same-sex-document.html

Written by 3BE6E3286B2D3965870F36A1512E8D229734B1217BE516BCE9B8E456142025EC
Participant Details

All Information

• ID - 1674885962105757697
• noteId - 1674885962105757697
• participantId -
• noteAuthorParticipantId - 3BE6E3286B2D3965870F36A1512E8D229734B1217BE516BCE9B8E456142025EC Participant Details
• createdAtMillis - 1688158905899
• tweetId - 1674793170838880257
• classification - MISINFORMED_OR_POTENTIALLY_MISLEADING
• believable -
• harmful -
• validationDifficulty -
• misleadingOther - 0
• misleadingFactualError - 1
• misleadingManipulatedMedia - 0
• misleadingOutdatedInformation - 0
• misleadingMissingImportantContext - 1
• misleadingUnverifiedClaimAsFact - 1
• misleadingSatire - 0
• notMisleadingOther - 0
• notMisleadingFactuallyCorrect - 0
• notMisleadingOutdatedButNotWhenWritten - 0
• notMisleadingClearlySatire - 0
• notMisleadingPersonalOpinion - 0
• trustworthySources - 1
• summary
• The claim that the Supreme Court granted "...business the right to refuse service to members of the LGBTQ community." is factually incorrect. The ruling was that applying a public-accommodation law to compel particular speech violates the First Amendment. https://www.nytimes.com/live/2023/06/30/us/gay-rights-free-speech-supreme-court https://www.nytimes.com/interactive/2023/06/30/us/gay-rights-first-amendment-same-sex-document.html