Birdwatch Note
2023-06-30 19:41:47 UTC - MISINFORMED_OR_POTENTIALLY_MISLEADING
The claim that the Supreme Court has ruled "straight-only" businesses legit is untrue. The ruling was confined to “whether applying a public-accommodation law to compel an artist to speak or stay silent violates the free speech clause of the First Amendment.” https://www.nytimes.com/live/2023/06/30/us/gay-rights-free-speech-supreme-court https://www.nytimes.com/interactive/2023/06/30/us/gay-rights-first-amendment-same-sex-document.html
Written by 3BE6E3286B2D3965870F36A1512E8D229734B1217BE516BCE9B8E456142025EC
Participant Details
Original Tweet
Tweet embedding is no longer reliably available, due to the platform's instability (in terms of both technology and policy). If the Tweet still exists, you can view it here: https://twitter.com/foo_bar/status/1674833857969782794
Please note, though, that you may need to have your own Twitter account to access that page. I am currently exploring options for archiving Tweet data in a post-API context.
All Information
- ID - 1674865837419937792
- noteId - 1674865837419937792
- participantId -
- noteAuthorParticipantId - 3BE6E3286B2D3965870F36A1512E8D229734B1217BE516BCE9B8E456142025EC Participant Details
- createdAtMillis - 1688154107799
- tweetId - 1674833857969782794
- classification - MISINFORMED_OR_POTENTIALLY_MISLEADING
- believable -
- harmful -
- validationDifficulty -
- misleadingOther - 0
- misleadingFactualError - 1
- misleadingManipulatedMedia - 0
- misleadingOutdatedInformation - 0
- misleadingMissingImportantContext - 1
- misleadingUnverifiedClaimAsFact - 1
- misleadingSatire - 0
- notMisleadingOther - 0
- notMisleadingFactuallyCorrect - 0
- notMisleadingOutdatedButNotWhenWritten - 0
- notMisleadingClearlySatire - 0
- notMisleadingPersonalOpinion - 0
- trustworthySources - 1
- summary
- The claim that the Supreme Court has ruled "straight-only" businesses legit is untrue. The ruling was confined to “whether applying a public-accommodation law to compel an artist to speak or stay silent violates the free speech clause of the First Amendment.” https://www.nytimes.com/live/2023/06/30/us/gay-rights-free-speech-supreme-court https://www.nytimes.com/interactive/2023/06/30/us/gay-rights-first-amendment-same-sex-document.html
Note Status History
| createdAt | timestampMillisOfFirstNonNMRStatus | firstNonNMRStatus | timestampMillisOfCurrentStatus | currentStatus | timestampMillisOfLatestNonNMRStatus | mostRecentNonNMRStatus | participantId |
| 2023-06-30 19:41:47 UTC (1688154107799) |
1969-12-31 23:59:59 UTC (-1) |
2023-07-01 02:12:43 UTC (1688177563036) |
NEEDS_MORE_RATINGS | 1969-12-31 23:59:59 UTC (-1) |
Note Ratings
| rated at | rated by | |
| 2023-06-30 19:20:28 -0500 | Rating Details | |
| 2023-06-30 18:53:38 -0500 | Rating Details | |
| 2023-06-30 18:52:36 -0500 | Rating Details | |
| 2023-06-30 18:51:51 -0500 | Rating Details | |
| 2023-06-30 18:51:46 -0500 | Rating Details | |
| 2023-06-30 18:46:57 -0500 | Rating Details | |
| 2023-06-30 18:26:11 -0500 | Rating Details | |
| 2023-06-30 17:26:13 -0500 | Rating Details | |
| 2023-06-30 17:15:50 -0500 | Rating Details | |
| 2023-06-30 16:54:44 -0500 | Rating Details | |
| 2023-06-30 16:53:10 -0500 | Rating Details | |
| 2023-06-30 15:56:26 -0500 | Rating Details | |
| 2023-06-30 15:48:32 -0500 | Rating Details | |
| 2023-06-30 15:16:02 -0500 | Rating Details | |
| 2023-06-30 15:08:35 -0500 | Rating Details | |
| 2023-06-30 15:01:24 -0500 | Rating Details | |
| 2023-07-01 08:07:00 -0500 | Rating Details | |
| 2023-07-01 02:34:06 -0500 | Rating Details | |
| 2023-06-30 20:31:10 -0500 | Rating Details | |
| 2023-07-02 01:49:00 -0500 | Rating Details | |
| 2023-07-02 01:42:35 -0500 | Rating Details | |
| 2023-07-02 01:01:10 -0500 | Rating Details | |
| 2023-07-01 23:50:09 -0500 | Rating Details | |
| 2023-07-01 20:37:58 -0500 | Rating Details | |
| 2023-07-03 15:41:02 -0500 | Rating Details |