Birdwatch Note
2023-06-30 16:52:31 UTC - MISINFORMED_OR_POTENTIALLY_MISLEADING
The Supreme Court did not in fact rule that business owners can refuse to sell to LGBTQ people. In fact, both sides agreed they would. Instead, the Court ruled that the government cannot compel a business to express a message that the business does not believe in. https://www.supremecourt.gov/opinions/22pdf/21-476_c185.pdf
Written by DB13E7886F8EA816559284B89F0998843EE143C0A1724143FCFA1DFC683B70CE
Participant Details
Original Tweet
Tweet embedding is no longer reliably available, due to the platform's instability (in terms of both technology and policy). If the Tweet still exists, you can view it here: https://twitter.com/foo_bar/status/1674783428951306248
Please note, though, that you may need to have your own Twitter account to access that page. I am currently exploring options for archiving Tweet data in a post-API context.
All Information
- ID - 1674823239271583744
- noteId - 1674823239271583744
- participantId -
- noteAuthorParticipantId - DB13E7886F8EA816559284B89F0998843EE143C0A1724143FCFA1DFC683B70CE Participant Details
- createdAtMillis - 1688143951611
- tweetId - 1674783428951306248
- classification - MISINFORMED_OR_POTENTIALLY_MISLEADING
- believable -
- harmful -
- validationDifficulty -
- misleadingOther - 0
- misleadingFactualError - 1
- misleadingManipulatedMedia - 0
- misleadingOutdatedInformation - 0
- misleadingMissingImportantContext - 1
- misleadingUnverifiedClaimAsFact - 0
- misleadingSatire - 0
- notMisleadingOther - 0
- notMisleadingFactuallyCorrect - 0
- notMisleadingOutdatedButNotWhenWritten - 0
- notMisleadingClearlySatire - 0
- notMisleadingPersonalOpinion - 0
- trustworthySources - 1
- summary
- The Supreme Court did not in fact rule that business owners can refuse to sell to LGBTQ people. In fact, both sides agreed they would. Instead, the Court ruled that the government cannot compel a business to express a message that the business does not believe in. https://www.supremecourt.gov/opinions/22pdf/21-476_c185.pdf
Note Status History
| createdAt | timestampMillisOfFirstNonNMRStatus | firstNonNMRStatus | timestampMillisOfCurrentStatus | currentStatus | timestampMillisOfLatestNonNMRStatus | mostRecentNonNMRStatus | participantId |
| 2023-06-30 16:52:31 UTC (1688143951611) |
1969-12-31 23:59:59 UTC (-1) |
2023-07-01 02:12:43 UTC (1688177563036) |
NEEDS_MORE_RATINGS | 1969-12-31 23:59:59 UTC (-1) |
Note Ratings
| rated at | rated by | |
| 2023-06-30 19:32:21 -0500 | Rating Details | |
| 2023-06-30 19:22:38 -0500 | Rating Details | |
| 2023-06-30 17:54:13 -0500 | Rating Details | |
| 2023-06-30 17:38:32 -0500 | Rating Details | |
| 2023-06-30 16:46:22 -0500 | Rating Details | |
| 2023-06-30 15:17:04 -0500 | Rating Details | |
| 2023-06-30 13:49:31 -0500 | Rating Details | |
| 2023-06-30 13:09:02 -0500 | Rating Details | |
| 2023-06-30 12:47:03 -0500 | Rating Details | |
| 2023-06-30 12:39:26 -0500 | Rating Details | |
| 2023-06-30 12:09:58 -0500 | Rating Details | |
| 2023-06-30 12:06:54 -0500 | Rating Details | |
| 2023-07-01 08:49:20 -0500 | Rating Details | |
| 2023-07-01 03:38:05 -0500 | Rating Details | |
| 2023-07-01 02:50:51 -0500 | Rating Details | |
| 2023-07-01 02:07:31 -0500 | Rating Details | |
| 2023-07-01 01:26:04 -0500 | Rating Details | |
| 2023-07-01 01:24:33 -0500 | Rating Details | |
| 2023-07-01 01:23:42 -0500 | Rating Details | |
| 2023-07-01 00:39:41 -0500 | Rating Details | |
| 2023-07-01 00:26:44 -0500 | Rating Details | |
| 2023-07-01 00:20:00 -0500 | Rating Details | |
| 2023-07-01 00:17:41 -0500 | Rating Details | |
| 2023-07-01 00:10:59 -0500 | Rating Details | |
| 2023-07-01 00:07:33 -0500 | Rating Details | |
| 2023-06-30 23:45:04 -0500 | Rating Details | |
| 2023-06-30 23:38:53 -0500 | Rating Details | |
| 2023-06-30 23:15:04 -0500 | Rating Details | |
| 2023-06-30 22:34:51 -0500 | Rating Details | |
| 2023-06-30 21:40:45 -0500 | Rating Details | |
| 2023-06-30 21:39:26 -0500 | Rating Details | |
| 2023-06-30 20:19:23 -0500 | Rating Details | |
| 2023-06-30 19:51:21 -0500 | Rating Details |