Birdwatch Note
2023-06-30 16:15:02 UTC - MISINFORMED_OR_POTENTIALLY_MISLEADING
Headline implies Ms. Smith would not serve gay customers at all. Pg 1 of the ruling states she is willing to "create custom graphics & websites for clients of any sexual orientation" but "will not produce content that 'contradicts biblical truth' regardless of who orders it". https://www.supremecourt.gov/opinions/22pdf/21-476_c185.pdf
Written by BBA8553AECF75027870FBEA00EF7445879B9CF57259E41150403A47E08641E94
Participant Details
Original Tweet
Tweet embedding is no longer reliably available, due to the platform's instability (in terms of both technology and policy). If the Tweet still exists, you can view it here: https://twitter.com/foo_bar/status/1674783144950759424
Please note, though, that you may need to have your own Twitter account to access that page. I am currently exploring options for archiving Tweet data in a post-API context.
All Information
- ID - 1674813804625154048
- noteId - 1674813804625154048
- participantId -
- noteAuthorParticipantId - BBA8553AECF75027870FBEA00EF7445879B9CF57259E41150403A47E08641E94 Participant Details
- createdAtMillis - 1688141702215
- tweetId - 1674783144950759424
- classification - MISINFORMED_OR_POTENTIALLY_MISLEADING
- believable -
- harmful -
- validationDifficulty -
- misleadingOther - 0
- misleadingFactualError - 0
- misleadingManipulatedMedia - 0
- misleadingOutdatedInformation - 0
- misleadingMissingImportantContext - 1
- misleadingUnverifiedClaimAsFact - 0
- misleadingSatire - 0
- notMisleadingOther - 0
- notMisleadingFactuallyCorrect - 0
- notMisleadingOutdatedButNotWhenWritten - 0
- notMisleadingClearlySatire - 0
- notMisleadingPersonalOpinion - 0
- trustworthySources - 1
- summary
- Headline implies Ms. Smith would not serve gay customers at all. Pg 1 of the ruling states she is willing to "create custom graphics & websites for clients of any sexual orientation" but "will not produce content that 'contradicts biblical truth' regardless of who orders it". https://www.supremecourt.gov/opinions/22pdf/21-476_c185.pdf
Note Status History
createdAt | timestampMillisOfFirstNonNMRStatus | firstNonNMRStatus | timestampMillisOfCurrentStatus | currentStatus | timestampMillisOfLatestNonNMRStatus | mostRecentNonNMRStatus | participantId |
2023-06-30 16:15:02 UTC (1688141702215) |
1969-12-31 23:59:59 UTC (-1) |
2023-07-01 02:12:43 UTC (1688177563036) |
NEEDS_MORE_RATINGS | 1969-12-31 23:59:59 UTC (-1) |
Note Ratings
rated at | rated by | |
2023-06-30 19:17:19 -0500 | Rating Details | |
2023-06-30 18:53:19 -0500 | Rating Details | |
2023-06-30 18:37:01 -0500 | Rating Details | |
2023-06-30 18:17:22 -0500 | Rating Details | |
2023-06-30 17:45:10 -0500 | Rating Details | |
2023-06-30 17:37:30 -0500 | Rating Details | |
2023-06-30 16:32:02 -0500 | Rating Details | |
2023-06-30 14:16:53 -0500 | Rating Details | |
2023-06-30 14:10:57 -0500 | Rating Details | |
2023-06-30 13:30:50 -0500 | Rating Details | |
2023-06-30 13:08:44 -0500 | Rating Details | |
2023-06-30 13:01:25 -0500 | Rating Details | |
2023-06-30 13:00:14 -0500 | Rating Details | |
2023-06-30 12:58:05 -0500 | Rating Details | |
2023-06-30 12:42:57 -0500 | Rating Details | |
2023-06-30 12:33:55 -0500 | Rating Details | |
2023-06-30 12:32:00 -0500 | Rating Details | |
2023-06-30 12:31:09 -0500 | Rating Details | |
2023-06-30 12:18:09 -0500 | Rating Details | |
2023-06-30 12:08:09 -0500 | Rating Details | |
2023-06-30 12:06:45 -0500 | Rating Details | |
2023-06-30 11:51:24 -0500 | Rating Details | |
2023-06-30 11:46:25 -0500 | Rating Details | |
2023-06-30 11:43:40 -0500 | Rating Details | |
2023-06-30 11:42:39 -0500 | Rating Details | |
2023-06-30 11:36:57 -0500 | Rating Details | |
2023-06-30 11:26:29 -0500 | Rating Details | |
2023-07-01 13:26:07 -0500 | Rating Details | |
2023-07-01 01:59:43 -0500 | Rating Details | |
2023-06-30 21:35:45 -0500 | Rating Details | |
2023-06-30 21:27:05 -0500 | Rating Details |