Birdwatch Archive

Birdwatch Note

2023-06-29 21:41:02 UTC - MISINFORMED_OR_POTENTIALLY_MISLEADING

The UNCHR scheme is voluntary and aims to only house refugees in Rwanda temporarily. https://reliefweb.int/report/rwanda/unhcr-rwanda-factsheet-emergency-transit-mechanism-september-2022 There is also no evidence to the political persuasion of any of the lawyers and judges involved - they are merely applying the laws set by the UK Government itself as well as the ECHR.

Written by ED8949B13307CA0180C0C42F4C05586776CDAF12CFF33C1EDB3D405B7E917804
Participant Details

Original Tweet

Tweet embedding is no longer reliably available, due to the platform's instability (in terms of both technology and policy). If the Tweet still exists, you can view it here: https://twitter.com/foo_bar/status/1674433161680375808

Please note, though, that you may need to have your own Twitter account to access that page. I am currently exploring options for archiving Tweet data in a post-API context.

All Information

  • ID - 1674533458125660163
  • noteId - 1674533458125660163
  • participantId -
  • noteAuthorParticipantId - ED8949B13307CA0180C0C42F4C05586776CDAF12CFF33C1EDB3D405B7E917804 Participant Details
  • createdAtMillis - 1688074862401
  • tweetId - 1674433161680375808
  • classification - MISINFORMED_OR_POTENTIALLY_MISLEADING
  • believable -
  • harmful -
  • validationDifficulty -
  • misleadingOther - 0
  • misleadingFactualError - 0
  • misleadingManipulatedMedia - 0
  • misleadingOutdatedInformation - 0
  • misleadingMissingImportantContext - 1
  • misleadingUnverifiedClaimAsFact - 1
  • misleadingSatire - 0
  • notMisleadingOther - 0
  • notMisleadingFactuallyCorrect - 0
  • notMisleadingOutdatedButNotWhenWritten - 0
  • notMisleadingClearlySatire - 0
  • notMisleadingPersonalOpinion - 0
  • trustworthySources - 1
  • summary
    • The UNCHR scheme is voluntary and aims to only house refugees in Rwanda temporarily. https://reliefweb.int/report/rwanda/unhcr-rwanda-factsheet-emergency-transit-mechanism-september-2022 There is also no evidence to the political persuasion of any of the lawyers and judges involved - they are merely applying the laws set by the UK Government itself as well as the ECHR.

Note Status History

createdAt timestampMillisOfFirstNonNMRStatus firstNonNMRStatus timestampMillisOfCurrentStatus currentStatus timestampMillisOfLatestNonNMRStatus mostRecentNonNMRStatus participantId
2023-06-29 21:41:02 UTC
(1688074862401)
1969-12-31 23:59:59 UTC
(-1)
2023-06-30 02:12:57 UTC
(1688091177552)
NEEDS_MORE_RATINGS 1969-12-31 23:59:59 UTC
(-1)

Note Ratings

rated at rated by
2023-06-29 19:24:44 -0500 Rating Details
2023-06-30 01:44:40 -0500 Rating Details
2023-06-30 01:04:13 -0500 Rating Details
2023-06-30 00:28:56 -0500 Rating Details
2023-06-30 00:20:55 -0500 Rating Details
2023-06-30 00:20:19 -0500 Rating Details
2023-06-30 00:11:39 -0500 Rating Details
2023-06-29 23:09:11 -0500 Rating Details
2023-06-29 22:58:34 -0500 Rating Details
2023-07-15 12:11:59 -0500 Rating Details