Birdwatch Archive

Birdwatch Note

2023-06-29 19:55:42 UTC - MISINFORMED_OR_POTENTIALLY_MISLEADING

Es gibt keine Belege für diese Behauptung. Studien legen stattdessen nahe, dass die Übernahme der Narrative rechter Parteien durch konventionelle Parteien, deren Positionen in der Bevölkerung legitimieren, wovon vorrangig die rechten "Originale" profitieren. https://doi.org/10.1007/s12286-019-00412-w

Written by DD4ABAE675999EFE6E78E1C1C0056C382D5EDE27E3001B0FFE80EA63A6FE0B05
Participant Details

Original Tweet

Tweet embedding is no longer reliably available, due to the platform's instability (in terms of both technology and policy). If the Tweet still exists, you can view it here: https://twitter.com/foo_bar/status/1674086369969287169

Please note, though, that you may need to have your own Twitter account to access that page. I am currently exploring options for archiving Tweet data in a post-API context.

All Information

  • ID - 1674506950824849419
  • noteId - 1674506950824849419
  • participantId -
  • noteAuthorParticipantId - DD4ABAE675999EFE6E78E1C1C0056C382D5EDE27E3001B0FFE80EA63A6FE0B05 Participant Details
  • createdAtMillis - 1688068542569
  • tweetId - 1674086369969287169
  • classification - MISINFORMED_OR_POTENTIALLY_MISLEADING
  • believable -
  • harmful -
  • validationDifficulty -
  • misleadingOther - 0
  • misleadingFactualError - 0
  • misleadingManipulatedMedia - 0
  • misleadingOutdatedInformation - 0
  • misleadingMissingImportantContext - 0
  • misleadingUnverifiedClaimAsFact - 1
  • misleadingSatire - 0
  • notMisleadingOther - 0
  • notMisleadingFactuallyCorrect - 0
  • notMisleadingOutdatedButNotWhenWritten - 0
  • notMisleadingClearlySatire - 0
  • notMisleadingPersonalOpinion - 0
  • trustworthySources - 1
  • summary
    • Es gibt keine Belege für diese Behauptung. Studien legen stattdessen nahe, dass die Übernahme der Narrative rechter Parteien durch konventionelle Parteien, deren Positionen in der Bevölkerung legitimieren, wovon vorrangig die rechten "Originale" profitieren. https://doi.org/10.1007/s12286-019-00412-w

Note Status History

createdAt timestampMillisOfFirstNonNMRStatus firstNonNMRStatus timestampMillisOfCurrentStatus currentStatus timestampMillisOfLatestNonNMRStatus mostRecentNonNMRStatus participantId
2023-06-29 19:55:42 UTC
(1688068542569)
1969-12-31 23:59:59 UTC
(-1)
2023-06-30 02:12:57 UTC
(1688091177552)
NEEDS_MORE_RATINGS 1969-12-31 23:59:59 UTC
(-1)

Note Ratings

rated at rated by
2023-06-29 18:07:52 -0500 Rating Details
2023-06-29 15:50:34 -0500 Rating Details
2023-06-29 15:27:40 -0500 Rating Details
2023-06-29 15:18:11 -0500 Rating Details
2023-06-29 14:59:32 -0500 Rating Details
2023-06-30 07:25:46 -0500 Rating Details
2023-06-30 05:49:10 -0500 Rating Details
2023-06-30 05:42:40 -0500 Rating Details
2023-06-30 04:51:30 -0500 Rating Details
2023-06-30 03:17:21 -0500 Rating Details
2023-06-30 03:09:06 -0500 Rating Details
2023-06-30 02:13:51 -0500 Rating Details
2023-06-30 01:23:52 -0500 Rating Details
2023-06-29 22:23:54 -0500 Rating Details