Birdwatch Archive

Birdwatch Note

2023-06-29 05:07:36 UTC - MISINFORMED_OR_POTENTIALLY_MISLEADING

Dan O’Dowd’s company Green Hills Software is in fact a direct competitor to Tesla’s ADAS and FSD systems as marketed by their own team at least at the past 4 CES conventions. Green Hills Software at CES: https://twitter.com/wholemarsblog/status/1674221639884759041?s=46&t=llj6tN_UsSxtfLUuLbzpzQ

Written by A3850EFE75801652F2303A744C73D67671E3BA65FACE066320C259C5A09EB967
Participant Details

Original Tweet

Tweet embedding is no longer reliably available, due to the platform's instability (in terms of both technology and policy). If the Tweet still exists, you can view it here: https://twitter.com/foo_bar/status/1674230616689364992

Please note, though, that you may need to have your own Twitter account to access that page. I am currently exploring options for archiving Tweet data in a post-API context.

All Information

  • ID - 1674283452852477952
  • noteId - 1674283452852477952
  • participantId -
  • noteAuthorParticipantId - A3850EFE75801652F2303A744C73D67671E3BA65FACE066320C259C5A09EB967 Participant Details
  • createdAtMillis - 1688015256499
  • tweetId - 1674230616689364992
  • classification - MISINFORMED_OR_POTENTIALLY_MISLEADING
  • believable -
  • harmful -
  • validationDifficulty -
  • misleadingOther - 0
  • misleadingFactualError - 1
  • misleadingManipulatedMedia - 0
  • misleadingOutdatedInformation - 0
  • misleadingMissingImportantContext - 1
  • misleadingUnverifiedClaimAsFact - 0
  • misleadingSatire - 0
  • notMisleadingOther - 0
  • notMisleadingFactuallyCorrect - 0
  • notMisleadingOutdatedButNotWhenWritten - 0
  • notMisleadingClearlySatire - 0
  • notMisleadingPersonalOpinion - 0
  • trustworthySources - 1
  • summary
    • Dan O’Dowd’s company Green Hills Software is in fact a direct competitor to Tesla’s ADAS and FSD systems as marketed by their own team at least at the past 4 CES conventions. Green Hills Software at CES: https://twitter.com/wholemarsblog/status/1674221639884759041?s=46&t=llj6tN_UsSxtfLUuLbzpzQ

Note Status History

createdAt timestampMillisOfFirstNonNMRStatus firstNonNMRStatus timestampMillisOfCurrentStatus currentStatus timestampMillisOfLatestNonNMRStatus mostRecentNonNMRStatus participantId
2023-06-29 05:07:36 UTC
(1688015256499)
1969-12-31 23:59:59 UTC
(-1)
2023-06-30 02:12:57 UTC
(1688091177552)
NEEDS_MORE_RATINGS 1969-12-31 23:59:59 UTC
(-1)

Note Ratings

rated at rated by
2023-06-29 17:42:51 -0500 Rating Details
2023-06-29 16:34:19 -0500 Rating Details
2023-06-29 15:55:53 -0500 Rating Details
2023-06-29 13:39:09 -0500 Rating Details
2023-06-29 13:24:09 -0500 Rating Details
2023-06-29 11:50:22 -0500 Rating Details
2023-06-29 11:39:29 -0500 Rating Details
2023-06-29 11:24:00 -0500 Rating Details
2023-06-29 10:49:02 -0500 Rating Details
2023-06-29 10:29:05 -0500 Rating Details
2023-06-29 09:48:17 -0500 Rating Details
2023-06-29 07:36:53 -0500 Rating Details
2023-06-29 07:00:37 -0500 Rating Details
2023-06-29 06:52:16 -0500 Rating Details
2023-06-29 06:50:47 -0500 Rating Details
2023-06-29 06:37:01 -0500 Rating Details
2023-06-29 06:09:51 -0500 Rating Details
2023-06-29 04:50:53 -0500 Rating Details
2023-06-29 04:31:41 -0500 Rating Details
2023-06-29 04:03:54 -0500 Rating Details
2023-06-29 01:57:45 -0500 Rating Details
2023-06-29 01:40:16 -0500 Rating Details
2023-06-29 01:14:18 -0500 Rating Details
2023-06-29 01:13:42 -0500 Rating Details
2023-06-29 20:59:48 -0500 Rating Details