Birdwatch Archive

Birdwatch Note

2023-06-28 21:41:17 UTC - NOT_MISLEADING

Esse tweet não afirma que o uso de cerol é legal. Apesar de proibido pelo código penal brasileiro, é difícil verificar por um tweet o dolo necessário para categorizar essa postagem como apologia. www.jusbrasil.com.br/artigos/apologia-ao-crime-art-287-do-cp/1187083687/amp

Written by 5606EF5AB8B38814FAC1A94AE7DD693D47E37A72D030AD7D92A376ECECCBEFE7
Participant Details

Original Tweet

Tweet embedding is no longer reliably available, due to the platform's instability (in terms of both technology and policy). If the Tweet still exists, you can view it here: https://twitter.com/foo_bar/status/1673474711324377089

Please note, though, that you may need to have your own Twitter account to access that page. I am currently exploring options for archiving Tweet data in a post-API context.

All Information

  • ID - 1674171133975830534
  • noteId - 1674171133975830534
  • participantId -
  • noteAuthorParticipantId - 5606EF5AB8B38814FAC1A94AE7DD693D47E37A72D030AD7D92A376ECECCBEFE7 Participant Details
  • createdAtMillis - 1687988477592
  • tweetId - 1673474711324377089
  • classification - NOT_MISLEADING
  • believable -
  • harmful -
  • validationDifficulty -
  • misleadingOther - 0
  • misleadingFactualError - 0
  • misleadingManipulatedMedia - 0
  • misleadingOutdatedInformation - 0
  • misleadingMissingImportantContext - 0
  • misleadingUnverifiedClaimAsFact - 0
  • misleadingSatire - 0
  • notMisleadingOther - 1
  • notMisleadingFactuallyCorrect - 0
  • notMisleadingOutdatedButNotWhenWritten - 0
  • notMisleadingClearlySatire - 0
  • notMisleadingPersonalOpinion - 0
  • trustworthySources - 1
  • summary
    • Esse tweet não afirma que o uso de cerol é legal. Apesar de proibido pelo código penal brasileiro, é difícil verificar por um tweet o dolo necessário para categorizar essa postagem como apologia. www.jusbrasil.com.br/artigos/apologia-ao-crime-art-287-do-cp/1187083687/amp

Note Status History

createdAt timestampMillisOfFirstNonNMRStatus firstNonNMRStatus timestampMillisOfCurrentStatus currentStatus timestampMillisOfLatestNonNMRStatus mostRecentNonNMRStatus participantId
2023-06-28 21:41:17 UTC
(1687988477592)
1969-12-31 23:59:59 UTC
(-1)
2023-06-29 02:10:57 UTC
(1688004657067)
NEEDS_MORE_RATINGS 1969-12-31 23:59:59 UTC
(-1)

Note Ratings

rated at rated by
2023-06-28 19:04:11 -0500 Rating Details
2023-06-28 18:24:40 -0500 Rating Details
2023-06-28 18:08:38 -0500 Rating Details
2023-06-28 18:08:24 -0500 Rating Details
2023-06-28 17:45:04 -0500 Rating Details
2023-06-28 17:42:07 -0500 Rating Details
2023-06-28 17:36:18 -0500 Rating Details
2023-06-28 17:28:07 -0500 Rating Details
2023-06-28 17:22:31 -0500 Rating Details
2023-06-28 17:20:02 -0500 Rating Details
2023-06-28 17:04:35 -0500 Rating Details
2023-06-28 16:59:35 -0500 Rating Details
2023-06-28 16:57:10 -0500 Rating Details
2023-06-28 16:44:16 -0500 Rating Details
2023-06-29 16:18:27 -0500 Rating Details
2023-06-29 14:14:23 -0500 Rating Details
2023-06-29 13:16:41 -0500 Rating Details
2023-06-29 12:56:05 -0500 Rating Details
2023-06-29 12:49:56 -0500 Rating Details
2023-06-29 11:19:48 -0500 Rating Details
2023-06-29 09:46:24 -0500 Rating Details
2023-06-29 09:31:07 -0500 Rating Details
2023-06-29 09:03:57 -0500 Rating Details
2023-06-29 08:05:51 -0500 Rating Details
2023-06-29 06:30:16 -0500 Rating Details
2023-06-29 04:11:38 -0500 Rating Details
2023-06-29 03:41:24 -0500 Rating Details
2023-06-28 23:57:59 -0500 Rating Details
2023-06-28 23:40:25 -0500 Rating Details
2023-06-28 23:02:30 -0500 Rating Details
2023-06-28 22:52:34 -0500 Rating Details
2023-06-28 22:01:33 -0500 Rating Details
2023-06-28 21:12:07 -0500 Rating Details
2023-06-28 21:01:53 -0500 Rating Details
2023-06-28 20:16:30 -0500 Rating Details
2023-06-30 08:32:56 -0500 Rating Details
2023-07-31 08:30:17 -0500 Rating Details