Birdwatch Note
2023-06-28 21:41:17 UTC - NOT_MISLEADING
Esse tweet não afirma que o uso de cerol é legal. Apesar de proibido pelo código penal brasileiro, é difícil verificar por um tweet o dolo necessário para categorizar essa postagem como apologia. www.jusbrasil.com.br/artigos/apologia-ao-crime-art-287-do-cp/1187083687/amp
Written by 5606EF5AB8B38814FAC1A94AE7DD693D47E37A72D030AD7D92A376ECECCBEFE7
Participant Details
Original Tweet
Tweet embedding is no longer reliably available, due to the platform's instability (in terms of both technology and policy). If the Tweet still exists, you can view it here: https://twitter.com/foo_bar/status/1673474711324377089
Please note, though, that you may need to have your own Twitter account to access that page. I am currently exploring options for archiving Tweet data in a post-API context.
All Information
- ID - 1674171133975830534
- noteId - 1674171133975830534
- participantId -
- noteAuthorParticipantId - 5606EF5AB8B38814FAC1A94AE7DD693D47E37A72D030AD7D92A376ECECCBEFE7 Participant Details
- createdAtMillis - 1687988477592
- tweetId - 1673474711324377089
- classification - NOT_MISLEADING
- believable -
- harmful -
- validationDifficulty -
- misleadingOther - 0
- misleadingFactualError - 0
- misleadingManipulatedMedia - 0
- misleadingOutdatedInformation - 0
- misleadingMissingImportantContext - 0
- misleadingUnverifiedClaimAsFact - 0
- misleadingSatire - 0
- notMisleadingOther - 1
- notMisleadingFactuallyCorrect - 0
- notMisleadingOutdatedButNotWhenWritten - 0
- notMisleadingClearlySatire - 0
- notMisleadingPersonalOpinion - 0
- trustworthySources - 1
- summary
- Esse tweet não afirma que o uso de cerol é legal. Apesar de proibido pelo código penal brasileiro, é difícil verificar por um tweet o dolo necessário para categorizar essa postagem como apologia. www.jusbrasil.com.br/artigos/apologia-ao-crime-art-287-do-cp/1187083687/amp
Note Status History
createdAt | timestampMillisOfFirstNonNMRStatus | firstNonNMRStatus | timestampMillisOfCurrentStatus | currentStatus | timestampMillisOfLatestNonNMRStatus | mostRecentNonNMRStatus | participantId |
2023-06-28 21:41:17 UTC (1687988477592) |
1969-12-31 23:59:59 UTC (-1) |
2023-06-29 02:10:57 UTC (1688004657067) |
NEEDS_MORE_RATINGS | 1969-12-31 23:59:59 UTC (-1) |
Note Ratings
rated at | rated by | |
2023-06-28 19:04:11 -0500 | Rating Details | |
2023-06-28 18:24:40 -0500 | Rating Details | |
2023-06-28 18:08:38 -0500 | Rating Details | |
2023-06-28 18:08:24 -0500 | Rating Details | |
2023-06-28 17:45:04 -0500 | Rating Details | |
2023-06-28 17:42:07 -0500 | Rating Details | |
2023-06-28 17:36:18 -0500 | Rating Details | |
2023-06-28 17:28:07 -0500 | Rating Details | |
2023-06-28 17:22:31 -0500 | Rating Details | |
2023-06-28 17:20:02 -0500 | Rating Details | |
2023-06-28 17:04:35 -0500 | Rating Details | |
2023-06-28 16:59:35 -0500 | Rating Details | |
2023-06-28 16:57:10 -0500 | Rating Details | |
2023-06-28 16:44:16 -0500 | Rating Details | |
2023-06-29 16:18:27 -0500 | Rating Details | |
2023-06-29 14:14:23 -0500 | Rating Details | |
2023-06-29 13:16:41 -0500 | Rating Details | |
2023-06-29 12:56:05 -0500 | Rating Details | |
2023-06-29 12:49:56 -0500 | Rating Details | |
2023-06-29 11:19:48 -0500 | Rating Details | |
2023-06-29 09:46:24 -0500 | Rating Details | |
2023-06-29 09:31:07 -0500 | Rating Details | |
2023-06-29 09:03:57 -0500 | Rating Details | |
2023-06-29 08:05:51 -0500 | Rating Details | |
2023-06-29 06:30:16 -0500 | Rating Details | |
2023-06-29 04:11:38 -0500 | Rating Details | |
2023-06-29 03:41:24 -0500 | Rating Details | |
2023-06-28 23:57:59 -0500 | Rating Details | |
2023-06-28 23:40:25 -0500 | Rating Details | |
2023-06-28 23:02:30 -0500 | Rating Details | |
2023-06-28 22:52:34 -0500 | Rating Details | |
2023-06-28 22:01:33 -0500 | Rating Details | |
2023-06-28 21:12:07 -0500 | Rating Details | |
2023-06-28 21:01:53 -0500 | Rating Details | |
2023-06-28 20:16:30 -0500 | Rating Details | |
2023-06-30 08:32:56 -0500 | Rating Details | |
2023-07-31 08:30:17 -0500 | Rating Details |