Birdwatch Note
2023-06-28 11:23:22 UTC - MISINFORMED_OR_POTENTIALLY_MISLEADING
1. Ziel des IPCC ist eine neutrale Zusammenfassung des Forschungsstands. https://www.ipcc.ch/about/ 2. Der IPCC arbeitet nach streng wissenschaftlichen Standards. (z.B. vollständige Transparenz https://www.ipcc.ch/report/ar6/wg1/downloads/drafts-and-reviews/ ) 3. Mehrfach wurde der Klimawandel durch die IPCC-Berichte eher unterschätzt. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.gloenvcha.2012.10.008
Written by DD4ABAE675999EFE6E78E1C1C0056C382D5EDE27E3001B0FFE80EA63A6FE0B05
Participant Details
Original Tweet
Tweet embedding is no longer reliably available, due to the platform's instability (in terms of both technology and policy). If the Tweet still exists, you can view it here: https://twitter.com/foo_bar/status/1673805180263964673
Please note, though, that you may need to have your own Twitter account to access that page. I am currently exploring options for archiving Tweet data in a post-API context.
All Information
- ID - 1674015627806212096
- noteId - 1674015627806212096
- participantId -
- noteAuthorParticipantId - DD4ABAE675999EFE6E78E1C1C0056C382D5EDE27E3001B0FFE80EA63A6FE0B05 Participant Details
- createdAtMillis - 1687951402033
- tweetId - 1673805180263964673
- classification - MISINFORMED_OR_POTENTIALLY_MISLEADING
- believable -
- harmful -
- validationDifficulty -
- misleadingOther - 0
- misleadingFactualError - 1
- misleadingManipulatedMedia - 0
- misleadingOutdatedInformation - 0
- misleadingMissingImportantContext - 1
- misleadingUnverifiedClaimAsFact - 1
- misleadingSatire - 0
- notMisleadingOther - 0
- notMisleadingFactuallyCorrect - 0
- notMisleadingOutdatedButNotWhenWritten - 0
- notMisleadingClearlySatire - 0
- notMisleadingPersonalOpinion - 0
- trustworthySources - 1
- summary
- 1. Ziel des IPCC ist eine neutrale Zusammenfassung des Forschungsstands. https://www.ipcc.ch/about/ 2. Der IPCC arbeitet nach streng wissenschaftlichen Standards. (z.B. vollständige Transparenz https://www.ipcc.ch/report/ar6/wg1/downloads/drafts-and-reviews/ ) 3. Mehrfach wurde der Klimawandel durch die IPCC-Berichte eher unterschätzt. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.gloenvcha.2012.10.008
Note Status History
createdAt | timestampMillisOfFirstNonNMRStatus | firstNonNMRStatus | timestampMillisOfCurrentStatus | currentStatus | timestampMillisOfLatestNonNMRStatus | mostRecentNonNMRStatus | participantId |
2023-06-28 11:23:22 UTC (1687951402033) |
1969-12-31 23:59:59 UTC (-1) |
2023-06-29 02:10:57 UTC (1688004657067) |
NEEDS_MORE_RATINGS | 1969-12-31 23:59:59 UTC (-1) |
Note Ratings
rated at | rated by | |
2023-06-28 18:36:24 -0500 | Rating Details | |
2023-06-28 15:40:36 -0500 | Rating Details | |
2023-06-28 10:38:33 -0500 | Rating Details | |
2023-06-28 07:49:11 -0500 | Rating Details | |
2023-06-28 07:08:21 -0500 | Rating Details | |
2023-06-29 07:48:18 -0500 | Rating Details | |
2023-06-29 01:07:28 -0500 | Rating Details | |
2023-06-29 00:07:30 -0500 | Rating Details | |
2023-12-25 15:43:18 -0600 | Rating Details | |
2023-12-25 13:29:32 -0600 | Rating Details | |
2023-12-25 08:09:39 -0600 | Rating Details | |
2023-12-25 04:25:53 -0600 | Rating Details | |
2023-12-25 03:47:56 -0600 | Rating Details |