Birdwatch Note
2023-06-28 06:24:01 UTC - MISINFORMED_OR_POTENTIALLY_MISLEADING
Claims of breakthroughs in Earthquake prediction research have failed to withstand scrutiny. Extensive searches have failed to find reliable precursors. https://academic.oup.com/gji/article/131/3/425/2138719 "…specific earthquakes cannot be predicted." https://skeptoid.com/episodes/4873 https://academic.oup.com/gji/article/230/1/50/6522179 https://pubs.geoscienceworld.org/ssa/bssa/article-abstract/3/4/187/115298/The-so-called-luminous-phenomena-of-earthquakes https://www.theguardian.com/science/blog/2012/may/30/attempts-predict-earthquakes-harm-good http://www.geo.mtu.edu/UPSeis/waves.html https://earthquake.usgs.gov/learn/topics/animal_eqs.php https://www.usgs.gov/faqs/can-you-predict-earthquakes
Written by E9E1216A6501D0FB775DDCC53BB8326334C827FDAED70C961503BE92846F4DC9
Participant Details
Original Tweet
Tweet embedding is no longer reliably available, due to the platform's instability (in terms of both technology and policy). If the Tweet still exists, you can view it here: https://twitter.com/foo_bar/status/1670797855009718278
Please note, though, that you may need to have your own Twitter account to access that page. I am currently exploring options for archiving Tweet data in a post-API context.
All Information
- ID - 1673940296751808518
- noteId - 1673940296751808518
- participantId -
- noteAuthorParticipantId - E9E1216A6501D0FB775DDCC53BB8326334C827FDAED70C961503BE92846F4DC9 Participant Details
- createdAtMillis - 1687933441711
- tweetId - 1670797855009718278
- classification - MISINFORMED_OR_POTENTIALLY_MISLEADING
- believable -
- harmful -
- validationDifficulty -
- misleadingOther - 0
- misleadingFactualError - 0
- misleadingManipulatedMedia - 0
- misleadingOutdatedInformation - 0
- misleadingMissingImportantContext - 1
- misleadingUnverifiedClaimAsFact - 1
- misleadingSatire - 0
- notMisleadingOther - 0
- notMisleadingFactuallyCorrect - 0
- notMisleadingOutdatedButNotWhenWritten - 0
- notMisleadingClearlySatire - 0
- notMisleadingPersonalOpinion - 0
- trustworthySources - 1
- summary
- Claims of breakthroughs in Earthquake prediction research have failed to withstand scrutiny. Extensive searches have failed to find reliable precursors. https://academic.oup.com/gji/article/131/3/425/2138719 "…specific earthquakes cannot be predicted." https://skeptoid.com/episodes/4873 https://academic.oup.com/gji/article/230/1/50/6522179 https://pubs.geoscienceworld.org/ssa/bssa/article-abstract/3/4/187/115298/The-so-called-luminous-phenomena-of-earthquakes https://www.theguardian.com/science/blog/2012/may/30/attempts-predict-earthquakes-harm-good http://www.geo.mtu.edu/UPSeis/waves.html https://earthquake.usgs.gov/learn/topics/animal_eqs.php https://www.usgs.gov/faqs/can-you-predict-earthquakes
Note Status History
| createdAt | timestampMillisOfFirstNonNMRStatus | firstNonNMRStatus | timestampMillisOfCurrentStatus | currentStatus | timestampMillisOfLatestNonNMRStatus | mostRecentNonNMRStatus | participantId |
| 2023-06-28 06:24:01 UTC (1687933441711) |
1969-12-31 23:59:59 UTC (-1) |
2023-06-29 02:10:57 UTC (1688004657067) |
NEEDS_MORE_RATINGS | 1969-12-31 23:59:59 UTC (-1) |
Note Ratings
| rated at | rated by | |
| 2023-06-28 02:39:51 -0500 | Rating Details | |
| 2023-06-28 01:39:54 -0500 | Rating Details | |
| 2023-06-28 01:38:34 -0500 | Rating Details | |
| 2024-05-22 22:30:51 -0500 | Rating Details |