Birdwatch Note
2023-06-28 06:18:34 UTC - MISINFORMED_OR_POTENTIALLY_MISLEADING
This new development MIGHT be different, but all previous claims of breakthroughs in Earthquake prediction research have failed to withstand scrutiny. The process is intrinsically stochastic. https://academic.oup.com/gji/article/131/3/425/2138719 "…specific earthquakes cannot be predicted." https://skeptoid.com/episodes/4873 https://academic.oup.com/gji/article/230/1/50/6522179 https://pubs.geoscienceworld.org/ssa/bssa/article-abstract/3/4/187/115298/The-so-called-luminous-phenomena-of-earthquakes https://www.theguardian.com/science/blog/2012/may/30/attempts-predict-earthquakes-harm-good http://www.geo.mtu.edu/UPSeis/waves.html https://earthquake.usgs.gov/learn/topics/animal_eqs.php https://www.usgs.gov/faqs/can-you-predict-earthquakes
Written by E9E1216A6501D0FB775DDCC53BB8326334C827FDAED70C961503BE92846F4DC9
Participant Details
Original Tweet
Tweet embedding is no longer reliably available, due to the platform's instability (in terms of both technology and policy). If the Tweet still exists, you can view it here: https://twitter.com/foo_bar/status/1673297086098309123
Please note, though, that you may need to have your own Twitter account to access that page. I am currently exploring options for archiving Tweet data in a post-API context.
All Information
- ID - 1673938923238879232
- noteId - 1673938923238879232
- participantId -
- noteAuthorParticipantId - E9E1216A6501D0FB775DDCC53BB8326334C827FDAED70C961503BE92846F4DC9 Participant Details
- createdAtMillis - 1687933114238
- tweetId - 1673297086098309123
- classification - MISINFORMED_OR_POTENTIALLY_MISLEADING
- believable -
- harmful -
- validationDifficulty -
- misleadingOther - 0
- misleadingFactualError - 0
- misleadingManipulatedMedia - 0
- misleadingOutdatedInformation - 0
- misleadingMissingImportantContext - 1
- misleadingUnverifiedClaimAsFact - 0
- misleadingSatire - 0
- notMisleadingOther - 0
- notMisleadingFactuallyCorrect - 0
- notMisleadingOutdatedButNotWhenWritten - 0
- notMisleadingClearlySatire - 0
- notMisleadingPersonalOpinion - 0
- trustworthySources - 1
- summary
- This new development MIGHT be different, but all previous claims of breakthroughs in Earthquake prediction research have failed to withstand scrutiny. The process is intrinsically stochastic. https://academic.oup.com/gji/article/131/3/425/2138719 "…specific earthquakes cannot be predicted." https://skeptoid.com/episodes/4873 https://academic.oup.com/gji/article/230/1/50/6522179 https://pubs.geoscienceworld.org/ssa/bssa/article-abstract/3/4/187/115298/The-so-called-luminous-phenomena-of-earthquakes https://www.theguardian.com/science/blog/2012/may/30/attempts-predict-earthquakes-harm-good http://www.geo.mtu.edu/UPSeis/waves.html https://earthquake.usgs.gov/learn/topics/animal_eqs.php https://www.usgs.gov/faqs/can-you-predict-earthquakes
Note Status History
| createdAt | timestampMillisOfFirstNonNMRStatus | firstNonNMRStatus | timestampMillisOfCurrentStatus | currentStatus | timestampMillisOfLatestNonNMRStatus | mostRecentNonNMRStatus | participantId |
| 2023-06-28 06:18:34 UTC (1687933114238) |
1969-12-31 23:59:59 UTC (-1) |
2023-06-29 02:10:57 UTC (1688004657067) |
NEEDS_MORE_RATINGS | 1969-12-31 23:59:59 UTC (-1) |