Birdwatch Archive

Birdwatch Note

2023-06-27 12:27:10 UTC - NOT_MISLEADING

NNN He is expressing an opinion and is factually correct. No vaccine uses an inert control and none ever did Other opinions in above community notes all give justification that using a different vaccine as a control arm is a good idea. Counter opinion should be in comments

Written by 45EEF9615FE2F3B7D1E98FEA661699D617870D2A9F1EF3ADE39E5A6E9E91C4FB
Participant Details

Original Tweet

Tweet embedding is no longer reliably available, due to the platform's instability (in terms of both technology and policy). If the Tweet still exists, you can view it here: https://twitter.com/foo_bar/status/1673483027618623489

Please note, though, that you may need to have your own Twitter account to access that page. I am currently exploring options for archiving Tweet data in a post-API context.

All Information

  • ID - 1673669298655469575
  • noteId - 1673669298655469575
  • participantId -
  • noteAuthorParticipantId - 45EEF9615FE2F3B7D1E98FEA661699D617870D2A9F1EF3ADE39E5A6E9E91C4FB Participant Details
  • createdAtMillis - 1687868830729
  • tweetId - 1673483027618623489
  • classification - NOT_MISLEADING
  • believable -
  • harmful -
  • validationDifficulty -
  • misleadingOther - 0
  • misleadingFactualError - 0
  • misleadingManipulatedMedia - 0
  • misleadingOutdatedInformation - 0
  • misleadingMissingImportantContext - 0
  • misleadingUnverifiedClaimAsFact - 0
  • misleadingSatire - 0
  • notMisleadingOther - 0
  • notMisleadingFactuallyCorrect - 0
  • notMisleadingOutdatedButNotWhenWritten - 0
  • notMisleadingClearlySatire - 0
  • notMisleadingPersonalOpinion - 1
  • trustworthySources - 0
  • summary
    • NNN He is expressing an opinion and is factually correct. No vaccine uses an inert control and none ever did Other opinions in above community notes all give justification that using a different vaccine as a control arm is a good idea. Counter opinion should be in comments

Note Status History

createdAt timestampMillisOfFirstNonNMRStatus firstNonNMRStatus timestampMillisOfCurrentStatus currentStatus timestampMillisOfLatestNonNMRStatus mostRecentNonNMRStatus participantId
2023-06-27 12:27:10 UTC
(1687868830729)
1969-12-31 23:59:59 UTC
(-1)
2023-06-28 02:10:31 UTC
(1687918231836)
NEEDS_MORE_RATINGS 1969-12-31 23:59:59 UTC
(-1)

Note Ratings

rated at rated by
2023-06-27 19:00:38 -0500 Rating Details
2023-06-27 17:20:03 -0500 Rating Details
2023-06-27 14:32:18 -0500 Rating Details
2023-06-27 12:50:19 -0500 Rating Details
2023-06-27 12:21:20 -0500 Rating Details
2023-06-27 08:53:24 -0500 Rating Details
2023-06-27 08:39:44 -0500 Rating Details
2023-06-27 07:42:04 -0500 Rating Details
2023-06-27 07:28:01 -0500 Rating Details
2023-06-28 18:08:19 -0500 Rating Details
2023-06-28 13:45:43 -0500 Rating Details
2023-06-28 13:29:40 -0500 Rating Details
2023-06-28 13:20:51 -0500 Rating Details
2023-06-28 12:32:47 -0500 Rating Details
2023-06-28 12:16:10 -0500 Rating Details
2023-06-28 08:44:47 -0500 Rating Details
2023-06-28 07:59:09 -0500 Rating Details
2023-06-28 07:05:49 -0500 Rating Details
2023-06-28 07:04:23 -0500 Rating Details
2023-06-28 07:04:06 -0500 Rating Details
2023-06-27 19:59:54 -0500 Rating Details
2023-06-29 13:52:25 -0500 Rating Details
2023-06-29 08:30:20 -0500 Rating Details
2023-06-28 21:55:49 -0500 Rating Details
2023-06-30 10:52:23 -0500 Rating Details
2023-06-29 21:13:33 -0500 Rating Details
2023-07-05 00:19:40 -0500 Rating Details
2023-08-04 02:04:31 -0500 Rating Details
2023-08-10 23:28:27 -0500 Rating Details
2024-05-17 11:37:06 -0500 Rating Details
2024-07-10 19:22:34 -0500 Rating Details