Birdwatch Note
2023-06-26 17:45:04 UTC - NOT_MISLEADING
NNN La réduction de la conso de viande est bien un des écogestes les plus efficaces à titre individuel Il se place 3e derrière la limitation des transports en avion & la rénovation de son logement Il n’est donc pas erroné de le qualifier d’écogeste le plus simple & efficace https://www.greenpeace.fr/quels-ecogestes-privilegier-pour-le-climat/
Written by 6555D7C8E0A163282076356B431A63F2EC2EE2619E9619D7466F9256DBBA378B
Participant Details
Original Tweet
Tweet embedding is no longer reliably available, due to the platform's instability (in terms of both technology and policy). If the Tweet still exists, you can view it here: https://twitter.com/foo_bar/status/1673211467250769920
Please note, though, that you may need to have your own Twitter account to access that page. I am currently exploring options for archiving Tweet data in a post-API context.
All Information
- ID - 1673386910427783169
- noteId - 1673386910427783169
- participantId -
- noteAuthorParticipantId - 6555D7C8E0A163282076356B431A63F2EC2EE2619E9619D7466F9256DBBA378B Participant Details
- createdAtMillis - 1687801504126
- tweetId - 1673211467250769920
- classification - NOT_MISLEADING
- believable -
- harmful -
- validationDifficulty -
- misleadingOther - 0
- misleadingFactualError - 0
- misleadingManipulatedMedia - 0
- misleadingOutdatedInformation - 0
- misleadingMissingImportantContext - 0
- misleadingUnverifiedClaimAsFact - 0
- misleadingSatire - 0
- notMisleadingOther - 0
- notMisleadingFactuallyCorrect - 1
- notMisleadingOutdatedButNotWhenWritten - 0
- notMisleadingClearlySatire - 0
- notMisleadingPersonalOpinion - 0
- trustworthySources - 1
- summary
- NNN La réduction de la conso de viande est bien un des écogestes les plus efficaces à titre individuel Il se place 3e derrière la limitation des transports en avion & la rénovation de son logement Il n’est donc pas erroné de le qualifier d’écogeste le plus simple & efficace https://www.greenpeace.fr/quels-ecogestes-privilegier-pour-le-climat/
Note Status History
| createdAt | timestampMillisOfFirstNonNMRStatus | firstNonNMRStatus | timestampMillisOfCurrentStatus | currentStatus | timestampMillisOfLatestNonNMRStatus | mostRecentNonNMRStatus | participantId |
| 2023-06-26 17:45:04 UTC (1687801504126) |
1969-12-31 23:59:59 UTC (-1) |
2023-06-27 02:11:14 UTC (1687831874558) |
NEEDS_MORE_RATINGS | 1969-12-31 23:59:59 UTC (-1) |
Note Ratings
| rated at | rated by | |
| 2023-06-26 18:47:18 -0500 | Rating Details | |
| 2023-06-26 17:52:00 -0500 | Rating Details | |
| 2023-06-26 17:11:59 -0500 | Rating Details | |
| 2023-06-26 16:32:15 -0500 | Rating Details | |
| 2023-06-26 16:19:10 -0500 | Rating Details | |
| 2023-06-26 15:29:26 -0500 | Rating Details | |
| 2023-06-26 14:56:35 -0500 | Rating Details | |
| 2023-06-26 14:29:43 -0500 | Rating Details | |
| 2023-06-26 13:35:32 -0500 | Rating Details | |
| 2023-06-26 13:33:07 -0500 | Rating Details | |
| 2023-06-26 13:31:01 -0500 | Rating Details | |
| 2023-06-26 13:27:34 -0500 | Rating Details | |
| 2023-06-26 13:07:59 -0500 | Rating Details | |
| 2023-06-26 13:01:51 -0500 | Rating Details | |
| 2023-06-26 12:45:51 -0500 | Rating Details | |
| 2023-06-27 18:22:30 -0500 | Rating Details | |
| 2023-06-27 10:18:50 -0500 | Rating Details | |
| 2023-06-27 02:53:56 -0500 | Rating Details | |
| 2023-06-27 02:37:10 -0500 | Rating Details | |
| 2023-06-27 02:14:05 -0500 | Rating Details | |
| 2023-06-27 02:09:32 -0500 | Rating Details | |
| 2023-06-27 02:06:51 -0500 | Rating Details | |
| 2023-06-27 01:08:02 -0500 | Rating Details | |
| 2023-06-27 00:52:42 -0500 | Rating Details | |
| 2023-06-27 00:36:46 -0500 | Rating Details | |
| 2023-06-28 00:59:52 -0500 | Rating Details | |
| 2023-06-29 03:15:54 -0500 | Rating Details | |
| 2023-07-03 14:20:26 -0500 | Rating Details | |
| 2023-07-31 01:57:07 -0500 | Rating Details | |
| 2023-07-31 01:53:20 -0500 | Rating Details |