Birdwatch Note
2023-06-26 13:36:51 UTC - MISINFORMED_OR_POTENTIALLY_MISLEADING
Sweden has not scrapped its Green Energy agenda. It has merely recognized that the requirements for baseload power could not be met by renewables alone, thus choosing to provide it using nuclear power, which produces less CO2 per MWh than most renewable energy sources. https://ourworldindata.org/safest-sources-of-energy
Written by 223CDCED7BBF8303E068C08FFB93D0816BF9F0915D27AD13383339E134BEC06B
Participant Details
Original Tweet
Tweet embedding is no longer reliably available, due to the platform's instability (in terms of both technology and policy). If the Tweet still exists, you can view it here: https://twitter.com/foo_bar/status/1673071256537649153
Please note, though, that you may need to have your own Twitter account to access that page. I am currently exploring options for archiving Tweet data in a post-API context.
All Information
- ID - 1673324445304344578
- noteId - 1673324445304344578
- participantId -
- noteAuthorParticipantId - 223CDCED7BBF8303E068C08FFB93D0816BF9F0915D27AD13383339E134BEC06B Participant Details
- createdAtMillis - 1687786611284
- tweetId - 1673071256537649153
- classification - MISINFORMED_OR_POTENTIALLY_MISLEADING
- believable -
- harmful -
- validationDifficulty -
- misleadingOther - 0
- misleadingFactualError - 1
- misleadingManipulatedMedia - 0
- misleadingOutdatedInformation - 0
- misleadingMissingImportantContext - 1
- misleadingUnverifiedClaimAsFact - 0
- misleadingSatire - 0
- notMisleadingOther - 0
- notMisleadingFactuallyCorrect - 0
- notMisleadingOutdatedButNotWhenWritten - 0
- notMisleadingClearlySatire - 0
- notMisleadingPersonalOpinion - 0
- trustworthySources - 1
- summary
- Sweden has not scrapped its Green Energy agenda. It has merely recognized that the requirements for baseload power could not be met by renewables alone, thus choosing to provide it using nuclear power, which produces less CO2 per MWh than most renewable energy sources. https://ourworldindata.org/safest-sources-of-energy
Note Status History
| createdAt | timestampMillisOfFirstNonNMRStatus | firstNonNMRStatus | timestampMillisOfCurrentStatus | currentStatus | timestampMillisOfLatestNonNMRStatus | mostRecentNonNMRStatus | participantId |
| 2023-06-26 13:36:51 UTC (1687786611284) |
1969-12-31 23:59:59 UTC (-1) |
2023-06-27 02:11:14 UTC (1687831874558) |
NEEDS_MORE_RATINGS | 1969-12-31 23:59:59 UTC (-1) |
Note Ratings
| rated at | rated by | |
| 2023-06-26 18:07:11 -0500 | Rating Details | |
| 2023-06-26 16:48:38 -0500 | Rating Details | |
| 2023-06-26 14:08:46 -0500 | Rating Details | |
| 2023-06-26 13:37:26 -0500 | Rating Details | |
| 2023-06-26 13:27:14 -0500 | Rating Details | |
| 2023-06-26 12:35:21 -0500 | Rating Details | |
| 2023-06-26 12:28:40 -0500 | Rating Details | |
| 2023-06-26 12:19:05 -0500 | Rating Details | |
| 2023-06-26 10:44:56 -0500 | Rating Details | |
| 2023-06-26 10:40:44 -0500 | Rating Details | |
| 2023-06-26 10:04:38 -0500 | Rating Details | |
| 2023-06-26 09:55:48 -0500 | Rating Details | |
| 2023-06-26 08:42:20 -0500 | Rating Details | |
| 2023-06-27 15:42:05 -0500 | Rating Details | |
| 2023-06-27 15:34:58 -0500 | Rating Details | |
| 2023-06-27 13:58:05 -0500 | Rating Details | |
| 2023-06-27 12:33:21 -0500 | Rating Details | |
| 2023-06-27 12:03:08 -0500 | Rating Details | |
| 2023-06-27 11:49:45 -0500 | Rating Details | |
| 2023-06-27 09:45:00 -0500 | Rating Details | |
| 2023-06-27 07:56:32 -0500 | Rating Details | |
| 2023-06-26 22:31:38 -0500 | Rating Details | |
| 2023-06-28 06:09:52 -0500 | Rating Details |