Birdwatch Note
2023-06-26 10:02:51 UTC - MISINFORMED_OR_POTENTIALLY_MISLEADING
Nein, ist er nicht. Das beweisen allein schon sein Interesse für "Furry" "Pornografischen Inhalt"
Written by CD49B4D69239FDA1317C12BA291474CAE25C213DA16BA74BBDFEC68D3A730012
Participant Details
Original Tweet
Tweet embedding is no longer reliably available, due to the platform's instability (in terms of both technology and policy). If the Tweet still exists, you can view it here: https://twitter.com/foo_bar/status/1673196321153470464
Please note, though, that you may need to have your own Twitter account to access that page. I am currently exploring options for archiving Tweet data in a post-API context.
All Information
- ID - 1673270592282271744
- noteId - 1673270592282271744
- participantId -
- noteAuthorParticipantId - CD49B4D69239FDA1317C12BA291474CAE25C213DA16BA74BBDFEC68D3A730012 Participant Details
- createdAtMillis - 1687773771721
- tweetId - 1673196321153470464
- classification - MISINFORMED_OR_POTENTIALLY_MISLEADING
- believable -
- harmful -
- validationDifficulty -
- misleadingOther - 0
- misleadingFactualError - 1
- misleadingManipulatedMedia - 0
- misleadingOutdatedInformation - 0
- misleadingMissingImportantContext - 0
- misleadingUnverifiedClaimAsFact - 0
- misleadingSatire - 1
- notMisleadingOther - 0
- notMisleadingFactuallyCorrect - 0
- notMisleadingOutdatedButNotWhenWritten - 0
- notMisleadingClearlySatire - 0
- notMisleadingPersonalOpinion - 0
- trustworthySources - 0
- summary
- Nein, ist er nicht. Das beweisen allein schon sein Interesse für "Furry" "Pornografischen Inhalt"
Note Status History
| createdAt | timestampMillisOfFirstNonNMRStatus | firstNonNMRStatus | timestampMillisOfCurrentStatus | currentStatus | timestampMillisOfLatestNonNMRStatus | mostRecentNonNMRStatus | participantId |
| 2023-06-26 10:02:51 UTC (1687773771721) |
1969-12-31 23:59:59 UTC (-1) |
2023-06-27 02:11:14 UTC (1687831874558) |
NEEDS_MORE_RATINGS | 1969-12-31 23:59:59 UTC (-1) |