Birdwatch Note
2023-06-25 19:06:45 UTC - NOT_MISLEADING
The note about how the chalkboard had the previous question “Should sports teams be gendered?” is misleading. Being factually incorrect aside (see link), logically it doesn’t make sense for there to be many “yes” votes on the prior question, considering the type of attendees: https://t.co/YUvk9CGtdB
Written by 57355648C101E7EBAB55BF1351EAC7CCDC7330818572A569DA38911617A21633
Participant Details
Original Tweet
Tweet embedding is no longer reliably available, due to the platform's instability (in terms of both technology and policy). If the Tweet still exists, you can view it here: https://twitter.com/foo_bar/status/1672710106599833603
Please note, though, that you may need to have your own Twitter account to access that page. I am currently exploring options for archiving Tweet data in a post-API context.
All Information
- ID - 1673045080972591108
- noteId - 1673045080972591108
- participantId -
- noteAuthorParticipantId - 57355648C101E7EBAB55BF1351EAC7CCDC7330818572A569DA38911617A21633 Participant Details
- createdAtMillis - 1687720005635
- tweetId - 1672710106599833603
- classification - NOT_MISLEADING
- believable -
- harmful -
- validationDifficulty -
- misleadingOther - 0
- misleadingFactualError - 0
- misleadingManipulatedMedia - 0
- misleadingOutdatedInformation - 0
- misleadingMissingImportantContext - 0
- misleadingUnverifiedClaimAsFact - 0
- misleadingSatire - 0
- notMisleadingOther - 0
- notMisleadingFactuallyCorrect - 1
- notMisleadingOutdatedButNotWhenWritten - 0
- notMisleadingClearlySatire - 0
- notMisleadingPersonalOpinion - 0
- trustworthySources - 1
- summary
- The note about how the chalkboard had the previous question “Should sports teams be gendered?” is misleading. Being factually incorrect aside (see link), logically it doesn’t make sense for there to be many “yes” votes on the prior question, considering the type of attendees: https://t.co/YUvk9CGtdB
Note Status History
| createdAt | timestampMillisOfFirstNonNMRStatus | firstNonNMRStatus | timestampMillisOfCurrentStatus | currentStatus | timestampMillisOfLatestNonNMRStatus | mostRecentNonNMRStatus | participantId |
| 2023-06-25 19:06:45 UTC (1687720005635) |
1969-12-31 23:59:59 UTC (-1) |
2023-06-26 02:09:46 UTC (1687745386207) |
NEEDS_MORE_RATINGS | 1969-12-31 23:59:59 UTC (-1) |
Note Ratings
| rated at | rated by | |
| 2023-06-25 19:13:47 -0500 | Rating Details | |
| 2023-06-25 19:11:28 -0500 | Rating Details | |
| 2023-06-25 17:43:21 -0500 | Rating Details | |
| 2023-06-25 16:53:02 -0500 | Rating Details | |
| 2023-06-25 16:39:11 -0500 | Rating Details | |
| 2023-06-25 16:16:26 -0500 | Rating Details | |
| 2023-06-25 16:12:17 -0500 | Rating Details | |
| 2023-06-25 15:45:10 -0500 | Rating Details | |
| 2023-06-25 15:32:17 -0500 | Rating Details | |
| 2023-06-25 15:30:09 -0500 | Rating Details | |
| 2023-06-25 15:20:53 -0500 | Rating Details | |
| 2023-06-25 15:16:05 -0500 | Rating Details | |
| 2023-06-25 14:58:41 -0500 | Rating Details | |
| 2023-06-25 14:27:21 -0500 | Rating Details | |
| 2023-06-25 14:25:59 -0500 | Rating Details | |
| 2023-06-25 14:22:31 -0500 | Rating Details | |
| 2023-06-25 14:19:18 -0500 | Rating Details | |
| 2023-06-25 14:15:30 -0500 | Rating Details | |
| 2023-06-25 14:12:24 -0500 | Rating Details | |
| 2023-06-26 08:56:13 -0500 | Rating Details | |
| 2023-06-26 08:38:52 -0500 | Rating Details | |
| 2023-06-26 07:55:38 -0500 | Rating Details | |
| 2023-06-26 00:36:06 -0500 | Rating Details | |
| 2023-06-25 23:25:18 -0500 | Rating Details | |
| 2023-06-25 23:09:21 -0500 | Rating Details | |
| 2023-06-25 23:09:19 -0500 | Rating Details | |
| 2023-06-25 22:49:08 -0500 | Rating Details | |
| 2023-06-25 22:27:03 -0500 | Rating Details | |
| 2023-07-11 02:33:04 -0500 | Rating Details |