Birdwatch Archive

Birdwatch Note

2023-06-25 17:09:02 UTC - NOT_MISLEADING

The sources cited do not dispute the co-ownership interest in the emerald mine. It seems to be disputed how wealthy the father was, but since the tweet does not give specific figures, it seems to be factually correct.

Written by 4F1F86DC11937B51BBD2A537F5D94EA5680652E51E39382227389D3CF0CC233F
Participant Details

All Information

• ID - 1673015457853448192
• noteId - 1673015457853448192
• participantId -
• noteAuthorParticipantId - 4F1F86DC11937B51BBD2A537F5D94EA5680652E51E39382227389D3CF0CC233F Participant Details
• createdAtMillis - 1687712942933
• tweetId - 1672940673123622917
• classification - NOT_MISLEADING
• believable -
• harmful -
• validationDifficulty -
• misleadingOther - 0
• misleadingFactualError - 0
• misleadingManipulatedMedia - 0
• misleadingOutdatedInformation - 0
• misleadingMissingImportantContext - 0
• misleadingUnverifiedClaimAsFact - 0
• misleadingSatire - 0
• notMisleadingOther - 0
• notMisleadingFactuallyCorrect - 1
• notMisleadingOutdatedButNotWhenWritten - 0
• notMisleadingClearlySatire - 0
• notMisleadingPersonalOpinion - 0
• trustworthySources - 0
• summary
• The sources cited do not dispute the co-ownership interest in the emerald mine. It seems to be disputed how wealthy the father was, but since the tweet does not give specific figures, it seems to be factually correct.