Birdwatch Note
2023-06-25 09:04:20 UTC - MISINFORMED_OR_POTENTIALLY_MISLEADING
There are many BBC staff who have expressed right wing or right leaning views in the past as listed by this tweeter. https://twitter.com/russincheshire/status/1672552122087362561?s=46&t=zcvryOv8Nm-zoB-0ExEjEA However all 3 listed by the original tweet don’t work for BBC news and are less restricted in expressing their view for impartiality reasons.
Written by 0549AB0AE017EDA387FAA5475314E8280E9041CF534F8378140EAE06684A0407
Participant Details
Original Tweet
Tweet embedding is no longer reliably available, due to the platform's instability (in terms of both technology and policy). If the Tweet still exists, you can view it here: https://twitter.com/foo_bar/status/1671180430177976320
Please note, though, that you may need to have your own Twitter account to access that page. I am currently exploring options for archiving Tweet data in a post-API context.
All Information
- ID - 1672893477737070594
- noteId - 1672893477737070594
- participantId -
- noteAuthorParticipantId - 0549AB0AE017EDA387FAA5475314E8280E9041CF534F8378140EAE06684A0407 Participant Details
- createdAtMillis - 1687683860608
- tweetId - 1671180430177976320
- classification - MISINFORMED_OR_POTENTIALLY_MISLEADING
- believable -
- harmful -
- validationDifficulty -
- misleadingOther - 0
- misleadingFactualError - 0
- misleadingManipulatedMedia - 0
- misleadingOutdatedInformation - 0
- misleadingMissingImportantContext - 1
- misleadingUnverifiedClaimAsFact - 0
- misleadingSatire - 0
- notMisleadingOther - 0
- notMisleadingFactuallyCorrect - 0
- notMisleadingOutdatedButNotWhenWritten - 0
- notMisleadingClearlySatire - 0
- notMisleadingPersonalOpinion - 0
- trustworthySources - 1
- summary
- There are many BBC staff who have expressed right wing or right leaning views in the past as listed by this tweeter. https://twitter.com/russincheshire/status/1672552122087362561?s=46&t=zcvryOv8Nm-zoB-0ExEjEA However all 3 listed by the original tweet don’t work for BBC news and are less restricted in expressing their view for impartiality reasons.
Note Status History
createdAt | timestampMillisOfFirstNonNMRStatus | firstNonNMRStatus | timestampMillisOfCurrentStatus | currentStatus | timestampMillisOfLatestNonNMRStatus | mostRecentNonNMRStatus | participantId |
2023-06-25 09:04:20 UTC (1687683860608) |
1969-12-31 23:59:59 UTC (-1) |
2023-06-26 02:09:46 UTC (1687745386207) |
NEEDS_MORE_RATINGS | 1969-12-31 23:59:59 UTC (-1) |
Note Ratings
rated at | rated by | |
2023-06-25 11:29:51 -0500 | Rating Details | |
2023-06-25 10:51:41 -0500 | Rating Details | |
2023-06-25 10:49:04 -0500 | Rating Details | |
2023-06-25 10:45:00 -0500 | Rating Details | |
2023-06-25 10:34:34 -0500 | Rating Details | |
2023-06-25 10:20:32 -0500 | Rating Details | |
2023-06-25 09:43:02 -0500 | Rating Details | |
2023-06-25 09:40:51 -0500 | Rating Details | |
2023-06-25 06:27:38 -0500 | Rating Details | |
2023-06-25 06:13:14 -0500 | Rating Details | |
2023-06-25 05:40:11 -0500 | Rating Details | |
2023-06-25 05:40:03 -0500 | Rating Details | |
2023-06-25 05:15:47 -0500 | Rating Details | |
2023-06-25 05:08:42 -0500 | Rating Details | |
2023-06-25 04:54:12 -0500 | Rating Details | |
2023-06-25 04:38:30 -0500 | Rating Details | |
2023-06-25 04:22:26 -0500 | Rating Details | |
2023-06-27 03:57:45 -0500 | Rating Details | |
2023-07-09 04:47:08 -0500 | Rating Details |