Birdwatch Archive

Birdwatch Note

2023-06-24 23:19:45 UTC - MISINFORMED_OR_POTENTIALLY_MISLEADING

Cleveland Clinic paper doesn't say the bivalent booster increases the risk of catching COVID, but that it reduced infections by 30% The 2nd study did not adjust for health factors. There's no clear/compelling evidence repeated vaccination makes you more prone to COVID-19 https://www.mcgill.ca/oss/article/covid-19-medical/vaccine-study-has-people-worried-being-misinterpreted https://www.factcheck.org/2023/06/scicheck-cleveland-clinic-study-did-not-show-vaccines-increase-covid-19-risk/

Written by F735563C1D6CACAE98B239A5BF3B6B29334E5A32093D655B66C4A4A96408409D
Participant Details

Original Tweet

Tweet embedding is no longer reliably available, due to the platform's instability (in terms of both technology and policy). If the Tweet still exists, you can view it here: https://twitter.com/foo_bar/status/1672743854381080577

Please note, though, that you may need to have your own Twitter account to access that page. I am currently exploring options for archiving Tweet data in a post-API context.

All Information

  • ID - 1672746361647661057
  • noteId - 1672746361647661057
  • participantId -
  • noteAuthorParticipantId - F735563C1D6CACAE98B239A5BF3B6B29334E5A32093D655B66C4A4A96408409D Participant Details
  • createdAtMillis - 1687648785397
  • tweetId - 1672743854381080577
  • classification - MISINFORMED_OR_POTENTIALLY_MISLEADING
  • believable -
  • harmful -
  • validationDifficulty -
  • misleadingOther - 0
  • misleadingFactualError - 1
  • misleadingManipulatedMedia - 0
  • misleadingOutdatedInformation - 0
  • misleadingMissingImportantContext - 0
  • misleadingUnverifiedClaimAsFact - 0
  • misleadingSatire - 0
  • notMisleadingOther - 0
  • notMisleadingFactuallyCorrect - 0
  • notMisleadingOutdatedButNotWhenWritten - 0
  • notMisleadingClearlySatire - 0
  • notMisleadingPersonalOpinion - 0
  • trustworthySources - 1
  • summary
    • Cleveland Clinic paper doesn't say the bivalent booster increases the risk of catching COVID, but that it reduced infections by 30% The 2nd study did not adjust for health factors. There's no clear/compelling evidence repeated vaccination makes you more prone to COVID-19 https://www.mcgill.ca/oss/article/covid-19-medical/vaccine-study-has-people-worried-being-misinterpreted https://www.factcheck.org/2023/06/scicheck-cleveland-clinic-study-did-not-show-vaccines-increase-covid-19-risk/

Note Status History

createdAt timestampMillisOfFirstNonNMRStatus firstNonNMRStatus timestampMillisOfCurrentStatus currentStatus timestampMillisOfLatestNonNMRStatus mostRecentNonNMRStatus participantId
2023-06-24 23:19:45 UTC
(1687648785397)
1969-12-31 23:59:59 UTC
(-1)
2023-06-25 02:11:05 UTC
(1687659065717)
NEEDS_MORE_RATINGS 1969-12-31 23:59:59 UTC
(-1)

Note Ratings

rated at rated by
2023-06-24 19:18:35 -0500 Rating Details
2023-06-24 19:18:03 -0500 Rating Details
2023-06-24 18:55:56 -0500 Rating Details
2023-06-24 18:35:21 -0500 Rating Details
2023-06-24 18:34:08 -0500 Rating Details
2023-06-24 18:23:59 -0500 Rating Details
2023-06-25 08:53:28 -0500 Rating Details
2023-06-25 05:50:52 -0500 Rating Details
2023-06-25 05:30:22 -0500 Rating Details
2023-06-25 02:19:08 -0500 Rating Details
2023-06-25 02:09:01 -0500 Rating Details
2023-06-25 01:41:28 -0500 Rating Details
2023-06-24 21:37:50 -0500 Rating Details
2023-06-24 21:22:03 -0500 Rating Details
2023-06-24 19:51:36 -0500 Rating Details