Birdwatch Archive

Birdwatch Note

2023-06-24 22:32:16 UTC - MISINFORMED_OR_POTENTIALLY_MISLEADING

Ce n'est pas la ville qui déverse la somme de 180 000€ (et non 150 000€ comme annoncé dans le tweet) mais le département. via Radio France : https://www.radiofrance.fr/franceinter/cout-exorbitant-ou-opportunite-le-dilemme-des-departements-face-a-l-accueil-de-la-flamme-olympique-9766611

Written by 848166111051214CF452FB32F3AAAE9C9DEEF36707D8A21060189B1D3BBE0F76
Participant Details

Original Tweet

Tweet embedding is no longer reliably available, due to the platform's instability (in terms of both technology and policy). If the Tweet still exists, you can view it here: https://twitter.com/foo_bar/status/1672626128421367811

Please note, though, that you may need to have your own Twitter account to access that page. I am currently exploring options for archiving Tweet data in a post-API context.

All Information

  • ID - 1672734413837197314
  • noteId - 1672734413837197314
  • participantId -
  • noteAuthorParticipantId - 848166111051214CF452FB32F3AAAE9C9DEEF36707D8A21060189B1D3BBE0F76 Participant Details
  • createdAtMillis - 1687645936818
  • tweetId - 1672626128421367811
  • classification - MISINFORMED_OR_POTENTIALLY_MISLEADING
  • believable -
  • harmful -
  • validationDifficulty -
  • misleadingOther - 0
  • misleadingFactualError - 1
  • misleadingManipulatedMedia - 0
  • misleadingOutdatedInformation - 0
  • misleadingMissingImportantContext - 0
  • misleadingUnverifiedClaimAsFact - 0
  • misleadingSatire - 0
  • notMisleadingOther - 0
  • notMisleadingFactuallyCorrect - 0
  • notMisleadingOutdatedButNotWhenWritten - 0
  • notMisleadingClearlySatire - 0
  • notMisleadingPersonalOpinion - 0
  • trustworthySources - 1
  • summary
    • Ce n'est pas la ville qui déverse la somme de 180 000€ (et non 150 000€ comme annoncé dans le tweet) mais le département. via Radio France : https://www.radiofrance.fr/franceinter/cout-exorbitant-ou-opportunite-le-dilemme-des-departements-face-a-l-accueil-de-la-flamme-olympique-9766611

Note Status History

createdAt timestampMillisOfFirstNonNMRStatus firstNonNMRStatus timestampMillisOfCurrentStatus currentStatus timestampMillisOfLatestNonNMRStatus mostRecentNonNMRStatus participantId
2023-06-24 22:32:16 UTC
(1687645936818)
1969-12-31 23:59:59 UTC
(-1)
2023-06-25 02:11:05 UTC
(1687659065717)
NEEDS_MORE_RATINGS 1969-12-31 23:59:59 UTC
(-1)

Note Ratings

rated at rated by
2023-06-24 18:57:07 -0500 Rating Details
2023-06-25 15:05:40 -0500 Rating Details
2023-06-25 15:05:07 -0500 Rating Details
2023-06-25 11:03:40 -0500 Rating Details
2023-06-25 10:49:26 -0500 Rating Details
2023-06-25 07:07:50 -0500 Rating Details
2023-06-25 05:23:16 -0500 Rating Details
2023-06-25 05:03:30 -0500 Rating Details
2023-06-25 04:43:54 -0500 Rating Details
2023-06-25 04:28:24 -0500 Rating Details
2023-06-25 04:12:57 -0500 Rating Details
2023-06-25 04:08:10 -0500 Rating Details
2023-06-25 03:44:32 -0500 Rating Details
2023-06-25 03:36:14 -0500 Rating Details
2023-06-25 03:22:13 -0500 Rating Details
2023-06-25 03:20:10 -0500 Rating Details
2023-06-25 01:51:18 -0500 Rating Details
2023-06-25 01:38:20 -0500 Rating Details
2023-06-24 22:42:42 -0500 Rating Details
2023-06-24 22:31:01 -0500 Rating Details
2023-06-24 21:13:00 -0500 Rating Details
2023-06-26 19:16:02 -0500 Rating Details
2023-06-26 15:30:06 -0500 Rating Details
2023-06-26 11:56:16 -0500 Rating Details
2023-06-26 03:21:12 -0500 Rating Details
2023-06-27 17:40:40 -0500 Rating Details
2023-06-27 22:48:42 -0500 Rating Details
2023-06-29 15:33:37 -0500 Rating Details