Birdwatch Note
2023-06-24 16:12:13 UTC - NOT_MISLEADING
This tweet is expressing the author's opinion on the reasons behind Dr. Luke and Depp appealing. Community notes are NOT needed and it seems pretty clear.
Written by 5423C599B86DF51CA738ACC753E8461B28DC55F88FA6FDD9013F8EF623EB85D4
Participant Details
Original Tweet
Tweet embedding is no longer reliably available, due to the platform's instability (in terms of both technology and policy). If the Tweet still exists, you can view it here: https://twitter.com/foo_bar/status/1671981675209695251
Please note, though, that you may need to have your own Twitter account to access that page. I am currently exploring options for archiving Tweet data in a post-API context.
All Information
- ID - 1672638768925351936
- noteId - 1672638768925351936
- participantId -
- noteAuthorParticipantId - 5423C599B86DF51CA738ACC753E8461B28DC55F88FA6FDD9013F8EF623EB85D4 Participant Details
- createdAtMillis - 1687623133294
- tweetId - 1671981675209695251
- classification - NOT_MISLEADING
- believable -
- harmful -
- validationDifficulty -
- misleadingOther - 0
- misleadingFactualError - 0
- misleadingManipulatedMedia - 0
- misleadingOutdatedInformation - 0
- misleadingMissingImportantContext - 0
- misleadingUnverifiedClaimAsFact - 0
- misleadingSatire - 0
- notMisleadingOther - 0
- notMisleadingFactuallyCorrect - 0
- notMisleadingOutdatedButNotWhenWritten - 0
- notMisleadingClearlySatire - 0
- notMisleadingPersonalOpinion - 1
- trustworthySources - 0
- summary
- This tweet is expressing the author's opinion on the reasons behind Dr. Luke and Depp appealing. Community notes are NOT needed and it seems pretty clear.
Note Status History
createdAt | timestampMillisOfFirstNonNMRStatus | firstNonNMRStatus | timestampMillisOfCurrentStatus | currentStatus | timestampMillisOfLatestNonNMRStatus | mostRecentNonNMRStatus | participantId |
2023-06-24 16:12:13 UTC (1687623133294) |
1969-12-31 23:59:59 UTC (-1) |
2023-06-25 02:11:05 UTC (1687659065717) |
NEEDS_MORE_RATINGS | 1969-12-31 23:59:59 UTC (-1) |
Note Ratings
rated at | rated by | |
2023-06-24 19:11:40 -0500 | Rating Details | |
2023-06-24 18:57:54 -0500 | Rating Details | |
2023-06-24 18:31:18 -0500 | Rating Details | |
2023-06-24 18:28:50 -0500 | Rating Details | |
2023-06-24 18:28:33 -0500 | Rating Details | |
2023-06-24 18:19:39 -0500 | Rating Details | |
2023-06-24 17:57:28 -0500 | Rating Details | |
2023-06-24 17:38:03 -0500 | Rating Details | |
2023-06-24 17:37:46 -0500 | Rating Details | |
2023-06-24 17:07:27 -0500 | Rating Details | |
2023-06-24 17:07:16 -0500 | Rating Details | |
2023-06-24 16:30:43 -0500 | Rating Details | |
2023-06-24 15:22:43 -0500 | Rating Details | |
2023-06-24 14:30:32 -0500 | Rating Details | |
2023-06-24 14:30:23 -0500 | Rating Details | |
2023-06-24 14:12:07 -0500 | Rating Details | |
2023-06-24 13:30:44 -0500 | Rating Details | |
2023-06-24 13:13:02 -0500 | Rating Details | |
2023-06-24 13:12:26 -0500 | Rating Details | |
2023-06-24 13:08:57 -0500 | Rating Details | |
2023-06-24 12:47:39 -0500 | Rating Details | |
2023-06-25 08:14:34 -0500 | Rating Details | |
2023-06-25 05:06:41 -0500 | Rating Details | |
2023-06-25 04:00:03 -0500 | Rating Details | |
2023-06-25 03:39:27 -0500 | Rating Details | |
2023-06-25 01:25:16 -0500 | Rating Details | |
2023-06-25 01:08:45 -0500 | Rating Details | |
2023-06-25 00:20:14 -0500 | Rating Details | |
2023-06-24 22:57:05 -0500 | Rating Details | |
2023-06-24 21:50:07 -0500 | Rating Details | |
2023-06-24 21:26:31 -0500 | Rating Details | |
2023-06-26 13:26:49 -0500 | Rating Details | |
2023-06-28 02:06:44 -0500 | Rating Details |