Birdwatch Archive

Birdwatch Note

2023-06-24 11:15:58 UTC - NOT_MISLEADING

NNN. Biden isn't specifically referring to the Constitution. Also, in Roe v Wade, SCOTUS ruled that the Constitution protects a pregnant individual's liberty to have an abortion. https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Roe_v._Wade Saying that SCOTUS was right to overrule its past decision is opinion and doesn't belongs in CN: https://communitynotes.twitter.com/guide/en/contributing/values

Written by 4E5743C652F3801F461FE559BEEE741F7F016098F206E963AA11A47F6BFE437F
Participant Details

Original Tweet

Tweet embedding is no longer reliably available, due to the platform's instability (in terms of both technology and policy). If the Tweet still exists, you can view it here: https://twitter.com/foo_bar/status/1672336221735878656

Please note, though, that you may need to have your own Twitter account to access that page. I am currently exploring options for archiving Tweet data in a post-API context.

All Information

  • ID - 1672564215326859265
  • noteId - 1672564215326859265
  • participantId -
  • noteAuthorParticipantId - 4E5743C652F3801F461FE559BEEE741F7F016098F206E963AA11A47F6BFE437F Participant Details
  • createdAtMillis - 1687605358332
  • tweetId - 1672336221735878656
  • classification - NOT_MISLEADING
  • believable -
  • harmful -
  • validationDifficulty -
  • misleadingOther - 0
  • misleadingFactualError - 0
  • misleadingManipulatedMedia - 0
  • misleadingOutdatedInformation - 0
  • misleadingMissingImportantContext - 0
  • misleadingUnverifiedClaimAsFact - 0
  • misleadingSatire - 0
  • notMisleadingOther - 0
  • notMisleadingFactuallyCorrect - 1
  • notMisleadingOutdatedButNotWhenWritten - 0
  • notMisleadingClearlySatire - 0
  • notMisleadingPersonalOpinion - 0
  • trustworthySources - 1
  • summary
    • NNN. Biden isn't specifically referring to the Constitution. Also, in Roe v Wade, SCOTUS ruled that the Constitution protects a pregnant individual's liberty to have an abortion. https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Roe_v._Wade Saying that SCOTUS was right to overrule its past decision is opinion and doesn't belongs in CN: https://communitynotes.twitter.com/guide/en/contributing/values

Note Status History

createdAt timestampMillisOfFirstNonNMRStatus firstNonNMRStatus timestampMillisOfCurrentStatus currentStatus timestampMillisOfLatestNonNMRStatus mostRecentNonNMRStatus participantId
2023-06-24 11:15:58 UTC
(1687605358332)
1969-12-31 23:59:59 UTC
(-1)
2023-06-25 02:11:05 UTC
(1687659065717)
NEEDS_MORE_RATINGS 1969-12-31 23:59:59 UTC
(-1)

Note Ratings

rated at rated by
2023-06-24 17:36:25 -0500 Rating Details
2023-06-24 15:53:21 -0500 Rating Details
2023-06-24 15:19:05 -0500 Rating Details
2023-06-24 13:23:16 -0500 Rating Details
2023-06-24 11:58:59 -0500 Rating Details
2023-06-24 11:52:54 -0500 Rating Details
2023-06-24 11:05:52 -0500 Rating Details
2023-06-24 10:52:56 -0500 Rating Details
2023-06-24 10:46:02 -0500 Rating Details
2023-06-24 10:31:48 -0500 Rating Details
2023-06-24 10:10:17 -0500 Rating Details
2023-06-24 10:08:43 -0500 Rating Details
2023-06-24 10:06:37 -0500 Rating Details
2023-06-24 09:52:38 -0500 Rating Details
2023-06-24 09:28:31 -0500 Rating Details
2023-06-24 07:20:11 -0500 Rating Details
2023-06-24 07:18:00 -0500 Rating Details
2023-06-24 07:17:48 -0500 Rating Details
2023-06-24 07:07:42 -0500 Rating Details
2023-06-24 07:05:38 -0500 Rating Details
2023-06-24 06:53:21 -0500 Rating Details
2023-06-24 06:38:24 -0500 Rating Details
2023-06-24 06:24:35 -0500 Rating Details
2023-06-25 07:39:57 -0500 Rating Details
2023-07-01 09:02:50 -0500 Rating Details