Birdwatch Archive

Birdwatch Note

2023-06-24 04:37:22 UTC - MISINFORMED_OR_POTENTIALLY_MISLEADING

The CPC did not oppose government assisted childcare. They objected to a plan that only benefited the 9-to-5 set, leaving people who work shifts or weekends out of luck. They did vote for the childcare bill & the Liberal MP just presented her partisan opinion as if it were fact.

Written by CDEB6E83B66DEFB3BDB53163CF75D843B88661413DBD3B7B783F70EAA38D7B9F
Participant Details

Original Tweet

Tweet embedding is no longer reliably available, due to the platform's instability (in terms of both technology and policy). If the Tweet still exists, you can view it here: https://twitter.com/foo_bar/status/1672278608474243073

Please note, though, that you may need to have your own Twitter account to access that page. I am currently exploring options for archiving Tweet data in a post-API context.

All Information

  • ID - 1672463903866126337
  • noteId - 1672463903866126337
  • participantId -
  • noteAuthorParticipantId - CDEB6E83B66DEFB3BDB53163CF75D843B88661413DBD3B7B783F70EAA38D7B9F Participant Details
  • createdAtMillis - 1687581442215
  • tweetId - 1672278608474243073
  • classification - MISINFORMED_OR_POTENTIALLY_MISLEADING
  • believable -
  • harmful -
  • validationDifficulty -
  • misleadingOther - 0
  • misleadingFactualError - 1
  • misleadingManipulatedMedia - 0
  • misleadingOutdatedInformation - 0
  • misleadingMissingImportantContext - 1
  • misleadingUnverifiedClaimAsFact - 1
  • misleadingSatire - 0
  • notMisleadingOther - 0
  • notMisleadingFactuallyCorrect - 0
  • notMisleadingOutdatedButNotWhenWritten - 0
  • notMisleadingClearlySatire - 0
  • notMisleadingPersonalOpinion - 0
  • trustworthySources - 1
  • summary
    • The CPC did not oppose government assisted childcare. They objected to a plan that only benefited the 9-to-5 set, leaving people who work shifts or weekends out of luck. They did vote for the childcare bill & the Liberal MP just presented her partisan opinion as if it were fact.

Note Status History

createdAt timestampMillisOfFirstNonNMRStatus firstNonNMRStatus timestampMillisOfCurrentStatus currentStatus timestampMillisOfLatestNonNMRStatus mostRecentNonNMRStatus participantId
2023-06-24 04:37:22 UTC
(1687581442215)
1969-12-31 23:59:59 UTC
(-1)
2023-06-25 02:11:05 UTC
(1687659065717)
NEEDS_MORE_RATINGS 1969-12-31 23:59:59 UTC
(-1)

Note Ratings

rated at rated by
2023-06-24 02:28:39 -0500 Rating Details
2023-06-24 01:48:24 -0500 Rating Details
2023-06-24 01:41:20 -0500 Rating Details
2023-06-24 00:17:34 -0500 Rating Details
2023-06-25 07:03:24 -0500 Rating Details
2023-06-24 21:08:41 -0500 Rating Details