Birdwatch Archive

Birdwatch Note

2023-06-23 05:30:51 UTC - MISINFORMED_OR_POTENTIALLY_MISLEADING

There is no scientific basis for earthquake prediction. There is always a chance for quakes at active faults, but specific forecasts like these perform no better than random when tested. Learn more: https://www.usgs.gov/faqs/can-you-predict-earthquakes https://scienceexchange.caltech.edu/topics/earthquakes/earthquakes-probabilities https://pnsn.org/outreach/faq/earthquake-prediction https://sitn.hms.harvard.edu/flash/2019/predicting-next-big-earthquake/ https://www.nature.com/articles/d41586-023-00685-y https://www.scientificamerican.com/article/can-we-predict-earthquakes-at-all1/ Reporting on user's history of similar pseudoscience claims: https://www.inverse.com/science/earthquake-prediction-dutchsinse-holmquist-conspiracy https://www.vice.com/en/article/kz4jyz/earthquake-conspiracy-theorists-are-wreaking-havoc-during-emergencies

Written by 8BBA91C4957E89E3F3E7375E11B946CC2326AC39FC2BFFD5359824DDE642711C
Participant Details

Original Tweet

Tweet embedding is no longer reliably available, due to the platform's instability (in terms of both technology and policy). If the Tweet still exists, you can view it here: https://twitter.com/foo_bar/status/1672006971682091011

Please note, though, that you may need to have your own Twitter account to access that page. I am currently exploring options for archiving Tweet data in a post-API context.

All Information

  • ID - 1672114978462257152
  • noteId - 1672114978462257152
  • participantId -
  • noteAuthorParticipantId - 8BBA91C4957E89E3F3E7375E11B946CC2326AC39FC2BFFD5359824DDE642711C Participant Details
  • createdAtMillis - 1687498251919
  • tweetId - 1672006971682091011
  • classification - MISINFORMED_OR_POTENTIALLY_MISLEADING
  • believable -
  • harmful -
  • validationDifficulty -
  • misleadingOther - 0
  • misleadingFactualError - 1
  • misleadingManipulatedMedia - 0
  • misleadingOutdatedInformation - 0
  • misleadingMissingImportantContext - 1
  • misleadingUnverifiedClaimAsFact - 1
  • misleadingSatire - 0
  • notMisleadingOther - 0
  • notMisleadingFactuallyCorrect - 0
  • notMisleadingOutdatedButNotWhenWritten - 0
  • notMisleadingClearlySatire - 0
  • notMisleadingPersonalOpinion - 0
  • trustworthySources - 1
  • summary
    • There is no scientific basis for earthquake prediction. There is always a chance for quakes at active faults, but specific forecasts like these perform no better than random when tested. Learn more: https://www.usgs.gov/faqs/can-you-predict-earthquakes https://scienceexchange.caltech.edu/topics/earthquakes/earthquakes-probabilities https://pnsn.org/outreach/faq/earthquake-prediction https://sitn.hms.harvard.edu/flash/2019/predicting-next-big-earthquake/ https://www.nature.com/articles/d41586-023-00685-y https://www.scientificamerican.com/article/can-we-predict-earthquakes-at-all1/ Reporting on user's history of similar pseudoscience claims: https://www.inverse.com/science/earthquake-prediction-dutchsinse-holmquist-conspiracy https://www.vice.com/en/article/kz4jyz/earthquake-conspiracy-theorists-are-wreaking-havoc-during-emergencies

Note Status History

createdAt timestampMillisOfFirstNonNMRStatus firstNonNMRStatus timestampMillisOfCurrentStatus currentStatus timestampMillisOfLatestNonNMRStatus mostRecentNonNMRStatus participantId
2023-06-23 05:30:51 UTC
(1687498251919)
1969-12-31 23:59:59 UTC
(-1)
2023-06-24 02:08:36 UTC
(1687572516632)
NEEDS_MORE_RATINGS 1969-12-31 23:59:59 UTC
(-1)

Note Ratings

rated at rated by
2023-06-23 12:05:16 -0500 Rating Details
2023-06-23 11:42:16 -0500 Rating Details
2023-06-23 10:49:07 -0500 Rating Details
2023-06-23 10:14:15 -0500 Rating Details
2023-06-23 08:52:05 -0500 Rating Details
2023-06-23 08:45:50 -0500 Rating Details
2023-06-23 07:30:47 -0500 Rating Details
2023-06-23 07:22:36 -0500 Rating Details
2023-06-23 06:34:50 -0500 Rating Details
2023-06-23 06:15:16 -0500 Rating Details
2023-06-23 06:08:30 -0500 Rating Details
2023-06-23 04:20:16 -0500 Rating Details
2023-06-23 04:15:46 -0500 Rating Details
2023-06-23 02:44:19 -0500 Rating Details
2023-06-23 02:35:26 -0500 Rating Details
2023-06-23 02:27:32 -0500 Rating Details
2023-06-23 02:25:37 -0500 Rating Details
2023-06-23 01:54:45 -0500 Rating Details
2023-06-23 01:48:25 -0500 Rating Details
2023-06-23 01:13:58 -0500 Rating Details
2023-06-23 01:04:23 -0500 Rating Details
2023-06-23 00:41:12 -0500 Rating Details
2023-06-23 00:40:48 -0500 Rating Details
2023-06-23 00:38:09 -0500 Rating Details
2023-06-23 00:36:25 -0500 Rating Details
2023-06-23 00:35:15 -0500 Rating Details
2023-06-24 08:34:49 -0500 Rating Details
2023-06-24 06:41:41 -0500 Rating Details
2023-06-24 00:12:57 -0500 Rating Details