Birdwatch Archive

Birdwatch Note

2023-06-22 13:00:14 UTC - NOT_MISLEADING

The paper cited in the tweet focuses on other aspects, not just whether risks caused by sea-level rise were communicated by scientists well enough. See the tweet by the leading author of the paper, in response to criticism: https://twitter.com/bobkopp/status/1671687828936294402 In short, no note needed.

Written by C480012CAB22191EBED559B22D118FFD5AAA4CB9AB2F8C778F49D584073F3D2F
Participant Details

Original Tweet

Tweet embedding is no longer reliably available, due to the platform's instability (in terms of both technology and policy). If the Tweet still exists, you can view it here: https://twitter.com/foo_bar/status/1670953860691640321

Please note, though, that you may need to have your own Twitter account to access that page. I am currently exploring options for archiving Tweet data in a post-API context.

All Information

  • ID - 1671865680243617795
  • noteId - 1671865680243617795
  • participantId -
  • noteAuthorParticipantId - C480012CAB22191EBED559B22D118FFD5AAA4CB9AB2F8C778F49D584073F3D2F Participant Details
  • createdAtMillis - 1687438814589
  • tweetId - 1670953860691640321
  • classification - NOT_MISLEADING
  • believable -
  • harmful -
  • validationDifficulty -
  • misleadingOther - 0
  • misleadingFactualError - 0
  • misleadingManipulatedMedia - 0
  • misleadingOutdatedInformation - 0
  • misleadingMissingImportantContext - 0
  • misleadingUnverifiedClaimAsFact - 0
  • misleadingSatire - 0
  • notMisleadingOther - 1
  • notMisleadingFactuallyCorrect - 0
  • notMisleadingOutdatedButNotWhenWritten - 0
  • notMisleadingClearlySatire - 0
  • notMisleadingPersonalOpinion - 0
  • trustworthySources - 1
  • summary
    • The paper cited in the tweet focuses on other aspects, not just whether risks caused by sea-level rise were communicated by scientists well enough. See the tweet by the leading author of the paper, in response to criticism: https://twitter.com/bobkopp/status/1671687828936294402 In short, no note needed.

Note Status History

createdAt timestampMillisOfFirstNonNMRStatus firstNonNMRStatus timestampMillisOfCurrentStatus currentStatus timestampMillisOfLatestNonNMRStatus mostRecentNonNMRStatus participantId
2023-06-22 13:00:14 UTC
(1687438814589)
1969-12-31 23:59:59 UTC
(-1)
2023-06-23 02:10:34 UTC
(1687486234701)
NEEDS_MORE_RATINGS 1969-12-31 23:59:59 UTC
(-1)

Note Ratings

rated at rated by
2023-06-22 17:27:55 -0500 Rating Details
2023-06-22 17:27:40 -0500 Rating Details
2023-06-22 15:55:36 -0500 Rating Details
2023-06-22 15:14:46 -0500 Rating Details
2023-06-22 13:27:18 -0500 Rating Details
2023-06-22 10:30:05 -0500 Rating Details
2023-06-22 09:01:23 -0500 Rating Details
2023-06-22 08:51:30 -0500 Rating Details
2023-06-23 16:44:57 -0500 Rating Details
2023-06-23 15:30:36 -0500 Rating Details
2023-06-23 10:58:00 -0500 Rating Details
2023-06-23 03:22:43 -0500 Rating Details
2023-06-23 02:06:19 -0500 Rating Details
2023-06-22 21:35:50 -0500 Rating Details
2023-06-24 11:50:05 -0500 Rating Details
2023-07-10 20:52:36 -0500 Rating Details
2023-11-24 01:45:43 -0600 Rating Details
2024-06-11 16:26:48 -0500 Rating Details