Birdwatch Archive

Birdwatch Note

2023-06-22 12:48:58 UTC - NOT_MISLEADING

This is a personal opinion, you can argue in the comments. The above note also doesn't take into consideration the context of the tweet, JK is complaining about the use of the word 'cis' as a cis person, there is no mention of women, the tweet is correct even if not impartial.

Written by 9A4387B05ADCC90D317477B58478CFBDA7D93340DF7DE0880F7415C31F6CC989
Participant Details

Original Tweet

Tweet embedding is no longer reliably available, due to the platform's instability (in terms of both technology and policy). If the Tweet still exists, you can view it here: https://twitter.com/foo_bar/status/1671568786271477760

Please note, though, that you may need to have your own Twitter account to access that page. I am currently exploring options for archiving Tweet data in a post-API context.

All Information

  • ID - 1671862846274125825
  • noteId - 1671862846274125825
  • participantId -
  • noteAuthorParticipantId - 9A4387B05ADCC90D317477B58478CFBDA7D93340DF7DE0880F7415C31F6CC989 Participant Details
  • createdAtMillis - 1687438138918
  • tweetId - 1671568786271477760
  • classification - NOT_MISLEADING
  • believable -
  • harmful -
  • validationDifficulty -
  • misleadingOther - 0
  • misleadingFactualError - 0
  • misleadingManipulatedMedia - 0
  • misleadingOutdatedInformation - 0
  • misleadingMissingImportantContext - 0
  • misleadingUnverifiedClaimAsFact - 0
  • misleadingSatire - 0
  • notMisleadingOther - 0
  • notMisleadingFactuallyCorrect - 1
  • notMisleadingOutdatedButNotWhenWritten - 0
  • notMisleadingClearlySatire - 0
  • notMisleadingPersonalOpinion - 1
  • trustworthySources - 0
  • summary
    • This is a personal opinion, you can argue in the comments. The above note also doesn't take into consideration the context of the tweet, JK is complaining about the use of the word 'cis' as a cis person, there is no mention of women, the tweet is correct even if not impartial.

Note Status History

createdAt timestampMillisOfFirstNonNMRStatus firstNonNMRStatus timestampMillisOfCurrentStatus currentStatus timestampMillisOfLatestNonNMRStatus mostRecentNonNMRStatus participantId
2023-06-22 12:48:58 UTC
(1687438138918)
1969-12-31 23:59:59 UTC
(-1)
2023-06-23 02:10:34 UTC
(1687486234701)
NEEDS_MORE_RATINGS 1969-12-31 23:59:59 UTC
(-1)

Note Ratings

rated at rated by
2023-06-22 17:25:14 -0500 Rating Details
2023-06-22 15:02:34 -0500 Rating Details
2023-06-22 14:05:13 -0500 Rating Details
2023-06-22 13:42:54 -0500 Rating Details
2023-06-22 13:15:18 -0500 Rating Details
2023-06-22 11:28:11 -0500 Rating Details
2023-06-22 10:25:04 -0500 Rating Details
2023-06-22 10:23:44 -0500 Rating Details
2023-06-22 10:09:17 -0500 Rating Details
2023-06-22 10:03:09 -0500 Rating Details
2023-06-22 09:31:30 -0500 Rating Details
2023-06-22 09:17:20 -0500 Rating Details
2023-06-22 08:40:36 -0500 Rating Details
2023-06-22 08:39:53 -0500 Rating Details
2023-06-22 08:35:55 -0500 Rating Details
2023-06-22 08:18:35 -0500 Rating Details
2023-06-22 08:08:55 -0500 Rating Details
2023-06-22 08:02:56 -0500 Rating Details
2023-06-22 07:59:53 -0500 Rating Details
2023-06-23 05:23:18 -0500 Rating Details
2023-06-24 02:14:08 -0500 Rating Details
2023-06-24 21:32:37 -0500 Rating Details
2023-07-07 15:07:25 -0500 Rating Details