Birdwatch Note
2023-06-21 13:15:43 UTC - MISINFORMED_OR_POTENTIALLY_MISLEADING
There is no authoritative conclusion that justice Alito violated any scotus ethics rules. https://www.cnn.com/2022/11/28/politics/supreme-court-samuel-alito-ethics-letter/index.html
Written by 17FFA9E0E5FEC71C73D16D5EB4E5C111033C94535DAC51E11D0E262EDD2C1574
Participant Details
Original Tweet
Tweet embedding is no longer reliably available, due to the platform's instability (in terms of both technology and policy). If the Tweet still exists, you can view it here: https://twitter.com/foo_bar/status/1671369733961138178
Please note, though, that you may need to have your own Twitter account to access that page. I am currently exploring options for archiving Tweet data in a post-API context.
All Information
- ID - 1671507188949319683
- noteId - 1671507188949319683
- participantId -
- noteAuthorParticipantId - 17FFA9E0E5FEC71C73D16D5EB4E5C111033C94535DAC51E11D0E262EDD2C1574 Participant Details
- createdAtMillis - 1687353343606
- tweetId - 1671369733961138178
- classification - MISINFORMED_OR_POTENTIALLY_MISLEADING
- believable -
- harmful -
- validationDifficulty -
- misleadingOther - 0
- misleadingFactualError - 1
- misleadingManipulatedMedia - 0
- misleadingOutdatedInformation - 0
- misleadingMissingImportantContext - 1
- misleadingUnverifiedClaimAsFact - 0
- misleadingSatire - 0
- notMisleadingOther - 0
- notMisleadingFactuallyCorrect - 0
- notMisleadingOutdatedButNotWhenWritten - 0
- notMisleadingClearlySatire - 0
- notMisleadingPersonalOpinion - 0
- trustworthySources - 1
- summary
- There is no authoritative conclusion that justice Alito violated any scotus ethics rules. https://www.cnn.com/2022/11/28/politics/supreme-court-samuel-alito-ethics-letter/index.html
Note Status History
| createdAt | timestampMillisOfFirstNonNMRStatus | firstNonNMRStatus | timestampMillisOfCurrentStatus | currentStatus | timestampMillisOfLatestNonNMRStatus | mostRecentNonNMRStatus | participantId |
| 2023-06-21 13:15:43 UTC (1687353343606) |
1969-12-31 23:59:59 UTC (-1) |
2023-06-22 02:11:12 UTC (1687399872183) |
NEEDS_MORE_RATINGS | 1969-12-31 23:59:59 UTC (-1) |
Note Ratings
| rated at | rated by | |
| 2023-06-21 14:20:04 -0500 | Rating Details | |
| 2023-06-21 13:42:20 -0500 | Rating Details | |
| 2023-06-21 12:39:06 -0500 | Rating Details | |
| 2023-06-21 12:19:58 -0500 | Rating Details | |
| 2023-06-21 12:14:38 -0500 | Rating Details | |
| 2023-06-21 11:04:17 -0500 | Rating Details | |
| 2023-06-21 11:03:02 -0500 | Rating Details | |
| 2023-06-21 11:01:24 -0500 | Rating Details | |
| 2023-06-21 10:24:39 -0500 | Rating Details | |
| 2023-06-21 10:17:29 -0500 | Rating Details | |
| 2023-06-21 09:49:55 -0500 | Rating Details | |
| 2023-06-21 09:27:59 -0500 | Rating Details | |
| 2023-06-21 09:09:45 -0500 | Rating Details | |
| 2023-06-21 08:51:29 -0500 | Rating Details | |
| 2023-06-21 08:44:04 -0500 | Rating Details | |
| 2023-06-21 08:42:30 -0500 | Rating Details | |
| 2023-06-21 08:26:27 -0500 | Rating Details | |
| 2023-06-21 08:20:23 -0500 | Rating Details | |
| 2023-06-22 10:17:14 -0500 | Rating Details | |
| 2023-06-21 22:53:13 -0500 | Rating Details |