Birdwatch Note
2023-06-20 11:52:01 UTC - NOT_MISLEADING
NNN. Tweet is mostly correct, though it can be more nuanced. Finances did play a big role. But losing the tech is one of the reasons NASA can't go back. https://apollo11space.com/why-cant-we-remake-the-rocketdyne-f1-engine/ SLS is being developed to restore the capability. Starship as well.
Written by EE3242087E8F77125EC90B6DDEFC0FE79A10FC1A4997E6F6DFDA7B970E57AFC8
Participant Details
Original Tweet
Tweet embedding is no longer reliably available, due to the platform's instability (in terms of both technology and policy). If the Tweet still exists, you can view it here: https://twitter.com/foo_bar/status/1671036559993208834
Please note, though, that you may need to have your own Twitter account to access that page. I am currently exploring options for archiving Tweet data in a post-API context.
All Information
- ID - 1671123735879745542
- noteId - 1671123735879745542
- participantId -
- noteAuthorParticipantId - EE3242087E8F77125EC90B6DDEFC0FE79A10FC1A4997E6F6DFDA7B970E57AFC8 Participant Details
- createdAtMillis - 1687261921268
- tweetId - 1671036559993208834
- classification - NOT_MISLEADING
- believable -
- harmful -
- validationDifficulty -
- misleadingOther - 0
- misleadingFactualError - 0
- misleadingManipulatedMedia - 0
- misleadingOutdatedInformation - 0
- misleadingMissingImportantContext - 0
- misleadingUnverifiedClaimAsFact - 0
- misleadingSatire - 0
- notMisleadingOther - 0
- notMisleadingFactuallyCorrect - 0
- notMisleadingOutdatedButNotWhenWritten - 0
- notMisleadingClearlySatire - 0
- notMisleadingPersonalOpinion - 1
- trustworthySources - 1
- summary
- NNN. Tweet is mostly correct, though it can be more nuanced. Finances did play a big role. But losing the tech is one of the reasons NASA can't go back. https://apollo11space.com/why-cant-we-remake-the-rocketdyne-f1-engine/ SLS is being developed to restore the capability. Starship as well.
Note Status History
| createdAt | timestampMillisOfFirstNonNMRStatus | firstNonNMRStatus | timestampMillisOfCurrentStatus | currentStatus | timestampMillisOfLatestNonNMRStatus | mostRecentNonNMRStatus | participantId |
| 2023-06-20 11:52:01 UTC (1687261921268) |
1969-12-31 23:59:59 UTC (-1) |
2023-06-21 02:12:43 UTC (1687313563423) |
NEEDS_MORE_RATINGS | 1969-12-31 23:59:59 UTC (-1) |
Note Ratings
| rated at | rated by | |
| 2023-06-20 12:46:03 -0500 | Rating Details | |
| 2023-06-20 10:15:55 -0500 | Rating Details | |
| 2023-06-20 09:45:42 -0500 | Rating Details | |
| 2023-06-20 09:14:11 -0500 | Rating Details | |
| 2023-06-20 09:13:22 -0500 | Rating Details | |
| 2023-06-20 08:52:40 -0500 | Rating Details | |
| 2023-06-20 08:37:53 -0500 | Rating Details | |
| 2023-06-20 08:05:43 -0500 | Rating Details | |
| 2023-06-20 08:05:07 -0500 | Rating Details | |
| 2023-06-20 08:02:37 -0500 | Rating Details | |
| 2023-06-20 07:51:01 -0500 | Rating Details | |
| 2023-06-20 07:42:44 -0500 | Rating Details | |
| 2023-06-20 07:38:33 -0500 | Rating Details | |
| 2023-06-20 07:11:32 -0500 | Rating Details | |
| 2023-06-20 07:01:00 -0500 | Rating Details | |
| 2023-06-20 06:57:20 -0500 | Rating Details | |
| 2023-06-20 06:53:15 -0500 | Rating Details |