Birdwatch Note
2023-06-19 15:56:28 UTC - NOT_MISLEADING
CN should be on the tweet itself, not the linked content. Is the tweet text Misleading?
Written by 2C0B6C8622426BFE647D56D102B714C1D01C31B0F5A3FCA831567F63BEAFB77A
Participant Details
Original Tweet
Tweet embedding is no longer reliably available, due to the platform's instability (in terms of both technology and policy). If the Tweet still exists, you can view it here: https://twitter.com/foo_bar/status/1670715349363195904
Please note, though, that you may need to have your own Twitter account to access that page. I am currently exploring options for archiving Tweet data in a post-API context.
All Information
- ID - 1670822867183841280
- noteId - 1670822867183841280
- participantId -
- noteAuthorParticipantId - 2C0B6C8622426BFE647D56D102B714C1D01C31B0F5A3FCA831567F63BEAFB77A Participant Details
- createdAtMillis - 1687190188579
- tweetId - 1670715349363195904
- classification - NOT_MISLEADING
- believable -
- harmful -
- validationDifficulty -
- misleadingOther - 0
- misleadingFactualError - 0
- misleadingManipulatedMedia - 0
- misleadingOutdatedInformation - 0
- misleadingMissingImportantContext - 0
- misleadingUnverifiedClaimAsFact - 0
- misleadingSatire - 0
- notMisleadingOther - 0
- notMisleadingFactuallyCorrect - 1
- notMisleadingOutdatedButNotWhenWritten - 0
- notMisleadingClearlySatire - 0
- notMisleadingPersonalOpinion - 0
- trustworthySources - 0
- summary
- CN should be on the tweet itself, not the linked content. Is the tweet text Misleading?
Note Status History
createdAt | timestampMillisOfFirstNonNMRStatus | firstNonNMRStatus | timestampMillisOfCurrentStatus | currentStatus | timestampMillisOfLatestNonNMRStatus | mostRecentNonNMRStatus | participantId |
2023-06-19 15:56:28 UTC (1687190188579) |
1969-12-31 23:59:59 UTC (-1) |
2023-06-20 02:11:46 UTC (1687227106707) |
NEEDS_MORE_RATINGS | 1969-12-31 23:59:59 UTC (-1) |
Note Ratings
rated at | rated by | |
2023-06-19 12:29:21 -0500 | Rating Details | |
2023-06-19 11:44:51 -0500 | Rating Details |