Birdwatch Note
2023-06-18 11:55:48 UTC - NOT_MISLEADING
I concur with Bountiful Grass Seagull but would add that CN are also appropriate when the advertisement appears to be deceptive or otherwise scammy.
Written by 9D56EBB9E5CADD5F48318FD5E6707B4DEA85C0A58C8727AC6578696C50B5E236
Participant Details
Original Tweet
Tweet embedding is no longer reliably available, due to the platform's instability (in terms of both technology and policy). If the Tweet still exists, you can view it here: https://twitter.com/foo_bar/status/1669610531035164672
Please note, though, that you may need to have your own Twitter account to access that page. I am currently exploring options for archiving Tweet data in a post-API context.
All Information
- ID - 1670399912972828672
- noteId - 1670399912972828672
- participantId -
- noteAuthorParticipantId - 9D56EBB9E5CADD5F48318FD5E6707B4DEA85C0A58C8727AC6578696C50B5E236 Participant Details
- createdAtMillis - 1687089348440
- tweetId - 1669610531035164672
- classification - NOT_MISLEADING
- believable -
- harmful -
- validationDifficulty -
- misleadingOther - 0
- misleadingFactualError - 0
- misleadingManipulatedMedia - 0
- misleadingOutdatedInformation - 0
- misleadingMissingImportantContext - 0
- misleadingUnverifiedClaimAsFact - 0
- misleadingSatire - 0
- notMisleadingOther - 1
- notMisleadingFactuallyCorrect - 0
- notMisleadingOutdatedButNotWhenWritten - 0
- notMisleadingClearlySatire - 0
- notMisleadingPersonalOpinion - 0
- trustworthySources - 0
- summary
- I concur with Bountiful Grass Seagull but would add that CN are also appropriate when the advertisement appears to be deceptive or otherwise scammy.
Note Status History
| createdAt | timestampMillisOfFirstNonNMRStatus | firstNonNMRStatus | timestampMillisOfCurrentStatus | currentStatus | timestampMillisOfLatestNonNMRStatus | mostRecentNonNMRStatus | participantId |
| 2023-06-18 11:55:48 UTC (1687089348440) |
1969-12-31 23:59:59 UTC (-1) |
2023-06-19 02:10:03 UTC (1687140603698) |
NEEDS_MORE_RATINGS | 1969-12-31 23:59:59 UTC (-1) |
Note Ratings
| rated at | rated by | |
| 2023-06-18 15:28:16 -0500 | Rating Details | |
| 2023-06-18 11:59:00 -0500 | Rating Details | |
| 2023-06-18 08:45:54 -0500 | Rating Details | |
| 2023-06-18 07:33:33 -0500 | Rating Details | |
| 2023-06-19 14:03:05 -0500 | Rating Details | |
| 2023-06-20 00:02:46 -0500 | Rating Details | |
| 2023-06-22 17:25:44 -0500 | Rating Details | |
| 2023-06-23 17:31:57 -0500 | Rating Details | |
| 2023-06-23 15:29:11 -0500 | Rating Details | |
| 2023-06-24 07:40:30 -0500 | Rating Details | |
| 2023-06-25 17:57:16 -0500 | Rating Details | |
| 2023-06-25 08:30:23 -0500 | Rating Details | |
| 2023-06-25 08:17:28 -0500 | Rating Details | |
| 2023-06-25 05:37:19 -0500 | Rating Details | |
| 2023-06-25 05:05:47 -0500 | Rating Details | |
| 2023-06-26 18:00:12 -0500 | Rating Details | |
| 2023-06-26 16:01:07 -0500 | Rating Details | |
| 2023-06-26 12:29:52 -0500 | Rating Details |