Birdwatch Archive

Birdwatch Note

2023-06-17 23:28:51 UTC - NOT_MISLEADING

The OP posted an opinion with some basis in fact. The rationale for going to war was to preempt the use of WMD https://en.m.wikipedia.org/wiki/Preemptive_war Bush argued for preemption in a June 1st, 2002 speech at West Point. https://en.m.wikipedia.org/wiki/Bush_Doctrine That said, counterarguments belong in the replies; no note needed.

Written by A6D38DC55E149872C839DB3D07AE67D86FD30CE6589B75B78939616E5C3BF2E6
Participant Details

Original Tweet

Tweet embedding is no longer reliably available, due to the platform's instability (in terms of both technology and policy). If the Tweet still exists, you can view it here: https://twitter.com/foo_bar/status/1670116919226281984

Please note, though, that you may need to have your own Twitter account to access that page. I am currently exploring options for archiving Tweet data in a post-API context.

All Information

  • ID - 1670211937177673733
  • noteId - 1670211937177673733
  • participantId -
  • noteAuthorParticipantId - A6D38DC55E149872C839DB3D07AE67D86FD30CE6589B75B78939616E5C3BF2E6 Participant Details
  • createdAtMillis - 1687044531519
  • tweetId - 1670116919226281984
  • classification - NOT_MISLEADING
  • believable -
  • harmful -
  • validationDifficulty -
  • misleadingOther - 0
  • misleadingFactualError - 0
  • misleadingManipulatedMedia - 0
  • misleadingOutdatedInformation - 0
  • misleadingMissingImportantContext - 0
  • misleadingUnverifiedClaimAsFact - 0
  • misleadingSatire - 0
  • notMisleadingOther - 0
  • notMisleadingFactuallyCorrect - 1
  • notMisleadingOutdatedButNotWhenWritten - 0
  • notMisleadingClearlySatire - 0
  • notMisleadingPersonalOpinion - 1
  • trustworthySources - 1
  • summary
    • The OP posted an opinion with some basis in fact. The rationale for going to war was to preempt the use of WMD https://en.m.wikipedia.org/wiki/Preemptive_war Bush argued for preemption in a June 1st, 2002 speech at West Point. https://en.m.wikipedia.org/wiki/Bush_Doctrine That said, counterarguments belong in the replies; no note needed.

Note Status History

createdAt timestampMillisOfFirstNonNMRStatus firstNonNMRStatus timestampMillisOfCurrentStatus currentStatus timestampMillisOfLatestNonNMRStatus mostRecentNonNMRStatus participantId
2023-06-17 23:28:51 UTC
(1687044531519)
1969-12-31 23:59:59 UTC
(-1)
2023-06-19 02:10:03 UTC
(1687140603698)
NEEDS_MORE_RATINGS 1969-12-31 23:59:59 UTC
(-1)

Note Ratings

rated at rated by
2023-06-18 14:40:18 -0500 Rating Details
2023-06-18 09:11:56 -0500 Rating Details
2023-06-18 07:05:38 -0500 Rating Details
2023-06-17 21:15:01 -0500 Rating Details
2023-06-17 19:30:53 -0500 Rating Details
2023-06-17 18:34:40 -0500 Rating Details