Birdwatch Note
2023-06-17 09:02:31 UTC - NOT_MISLEADING
The point the author is trying to make is not that Twitter says the post received 1 billion unique views, but how easy it is to buy views and sway the algorithm
Written by D722EA0756904A07D4B66CB261D696C9BB9620DECC6AE61DC488DCE6C5E76484
Participant Details
Original Tweet
Tweet embedding is no longer reliably available, due to the platform's instability (in terms of both technology and policy). If the Tweet still exists, you can view it here: https://twitter.com/foo_bar/status/1669665423682314250
Please note, though, that you may need to have your own Twitter account to access that page. I am currently exploring options for archiving Tweet data in a post-API context.
All Information
- ID - 1669993919189229568
- noteId - 1669993919189229568
- participantId -
- noteAuthorParticipantId - D722EA0756904A07D4B66CB261D696C9BB9620DECC6AE61DC488DCE6C5E76484 Participant Details
- createdAtMillis - 1686992551979
- tweetId - 1669665423682314250
- classification - NOT_MISLEADING
- believable -
- harmful -
- validationDifficulty -
- misleadingOther - 0
- misleadingFactualError - 0
- misleadingManipulatedMedia - 0
- misleadingOutdatedInformation - 0
- misleadingMissingImportantContext - 0
- misleadingUnverifiedClaimAsFact - 0
- misleadingSatire - 0
- notMisleadingOther - 1
- notMisleadingFactuallyCorrect - 1
- notMisleadingOutdatedButNotWhenWritten - 0
- notMisleadingClearlySatire - 0
- notMisleadingPersonalOpinion - 0
- trustworthySources - 0
- summary
- The point the author is trying to make is not that Twitter says the post received 1 billion unique views, but how easy it is to buy views and sway the algorithm
Note Status History
createdAt | timestampMillisOfFirstNonNMRStatus | firstNonNMRStatus | timestampMillisOfCurrentStatus | currentStatus | timestampMillisOfLatestNonNMRStatus | mostRecentNonNMRStatus | participantId |
2023-06-17 09:02:31 UTC (1686992551979) |
1969-12-31 23:59:59 UTC (-1) |
2023-06-19 02:10:03 UTC (1687140603698) |
NEEDS_MORE_RATINGS | 1969-12-31 23:59:59 UTC (-1) |
Note Ratings
rated at | rated by | |
2023-06-17 21:19:26 -0500 | Rating Details | |
2023-06-17 15:28:20 -0500 | Rating Details | |
2023-06-17 11:33:33 -0500 | Rating Details | |
2023-06-17 11:14:02 -0500 | Rating Details | |
2023-06-17 05:56:54 -0500 | Rating Details | |
2023-06-17 04:28:15 -0500 | Rating Details | |
2023-06-17 04:23:57 -0500 | Rating Details |