Birdwatch Note
2023-06-17 07:33:26 UTC - MISINFORMED_OR_POTENTIALLY_MISLEADING
The article states Ms Heard won the London Court Case against Mr Depp, however Ms Heard was not a party, it was NGN (The Sun) who were able to show Ms Heard’s allegations of abuse were more likely than not to have taken place based on the evidence presented. https://www.judiciary.uk/wp-content/uploads/2020/11/Judgment-FINAL.pdf
Written by 19E42369D4A6C2DF8329C2A5F4F34686E91A3214F3B94F42F4F0FFCAF74F1416
Participant Details
Original Tweet
Tweet embedding is no longer reliably available, due to the platform's instability (in terms of both technology and policy). If the Tweet still exists, you can view it here: https://twitter.com/foo_bar/status/1669683617537064966
Please note, though, that you may need to have your own Twitter account to access that page. I am currently exploring options for archiving Tweet data in a post-API context.
All Information
- ID - 1669971497421512704
- noteId - 1669971497421512704
- participantId -
- noteAuthorParticipantId - 19E42369D4A6C2DF8329C2A5F4F34686E91A3214F3B94F42F4F0FFCAF74F1416 Participant Details
- createdAtMillis - 1686987206214
- tweetId - 1669683617537064966
- classification - MISINFORMED_OR_POTENTIALLY_MISLEADING
- believable -
- harmful -
- validationDifficulty -
- misleadingOther - 0
- misleadingFactualError - 1
- misleadingManipulatedMedia - 0
- misleadingOutdatedInformation - 0
- misleadingMissingImportantContext - 0
- misleadingUnverifiedClaimAsFact - 0
- misleadingSatire - 0
- notMisleadingOther - 0
- notMisleadingFactuallyCorrect - 0
- notMisleadingOutdatedButNotWhenWritten - 0
- notMisleadingClearlySatire - 0
- notMisleadingPersonalOpinion - 0
- trustworthySources - 1
- summary
- The article states Ms Heard won the London Court Case against Mr Depp, however Ms Heard was not a party, it was NGN (The Sun) who were able to show Ms Heard’s allegations of abuse were more likely than not to have taken place based on the evidence presented. https://www.judiciary.uk/wp-content/uploads/2020/11/Judgment-FINAL.pdf
Note Status History
| createdAt | timestampMillisOfFirstNonNMRStatus | firstNonNMRStatus | timestampMillisOfCurrentStatus | currentStatus | timestampMillisOfLatestNonNMRStatus | mostRecentNonNMRStatus | participantId |
| 2023-06-17 07:33:26 UTC (1686987206214) |
1969-12-31 23:59:59 UTC (-1) |
2023-06-19 02:10:03 UTC (1687140603698) |
NEEDS_MORE_RATINGS | 1969-12-31 23:59:59 UTC (-1) |
Note Ratings
| rated at | rated by | |
| 2023-06-17 13:27:25 -0500 | Rating Details | |
| 2023-06-17 11:51:54 -0500 | Rating Details | |
| 2023-06-17 08:16:56 -0500 | Rating Details | |
| 2023-06-17 06:21:24 -0500 | Rating Details | |
| 2023-06-17 05:58:56 -0500 | Rating Details | |
| 2023-06-17 05:25:56 -0500 | Rating Details | |
| 2023-06-17 04:29:40 -0500 | Rating Details | |
| 2023-06-17 03:45:33 -0500 | Rating Details | |
| 2023-06-17 02:57:58 -0500 | Rating Details | |
| 2023-06-17 02:49:53 -0500 | Rating Details | |
| 2023-06-17 02:34:13 -0500 | Rating Details | |
| 2023-06-29 10:28:22 -0500 | Rating Details |