Birdwatch Note
2023-06-17 00:24:53 UTC - NOT_MISLEADING
If you propose a Note be placed on a well-sourced claim made in a tweet, using Wikipedia as the rebuttal source is sophomoric and should be avoided. NNN
Written by 3C3D23A9886C305A54384F2629636B0CF101890CE40F3D3B1B3E5D9D61A281EE
Participant Details
Original Tweet
Tweet embedding is no longer reliably available, due to the platform's instability (in terms of both technology and policy). If the Tweet still exists, you can view it here: https://twitter.com/foo_bar/status/1669732153121202178
Please note, though, that you may need to have your own Twitter account to access that page. I am currently exploring options for archiving Tweet data in a post-API context.
All Information
- ID - 1669863651912867840
- noteId - 1669863651912867840
- participantId -
- noteAuthorParticipantId - 3C3D23A9886C305A54384F2629636B0CF101890CE40F3D3B1B3E5D9D61A281EE Participant Details
- createdAtMillis - 1686961493840
- tweetId - 1669732153121202178
- classification - NOT_MISLEADING
- believable -
- harmful -
- validationDifficulty -
- misleadingOther - 0
- misleadingFactualError - 0
- misleadingManipulatedMedia - 0
- misleadingOutdatedInformation - 0
- misleadingMissingImportantContext - 0
- misleadingUnverifiedClaimAsFact - 0
- misleadingSatire - 0
- notMisleadingOther - 0
- notMisleadingFactuallyCorrect - 0
- notMisleadingOutdatedButNotWhenWritten - 0
- notMisleadingClearlySatire - 0
- notMisleadingPersonalOpinion - 1
- trustworthySources - 0
- summary
- If you propose a Note be placed on a well-sourced claim made in a tweet, using Wikipedia as the rebuttal source is sophomoric and should be avoided. NNN
Note Status History
createdAt | timestampMillisOfFirstNonNMRStatus | firstNonNMRStatus | timestampMillisOfCurrentStatus | currentStatus | timestampMillisOfLatestNonNMRStatus | mostRecentNonNMRStatus | participantId |
2023-06-17 00:24:53 UTC (1686961493840) |
1969-12-31 23:59:59 UTC (-1) |
2023-06-19 02:10:03 UTC (1687140603698) |
NEEDS_MORE_RATINGS | 1969-12-31 23:59:59 UTC (-1) |
Note Ratings
rated at | rated by | |
2023-06-17 10:44:55 -0500 | Rating Details | |
2023-06-17 06:28:37 -0500 | Rating Details | |
2023-06-17 04:13:20 -0500 | Rating Details | |
2023-06-17 01:34:27 -0500 | Rating Details | |
2023-06-16 23:55:33 -0500 | Rating Details | |
2023-06-16 22:44:07 -0500 | Rating Details | |
2023-06-16 22:04:46 -0500 | Rating Details | |
2023-06-16 22:01:33 -0500 | Rating Details | |
2023-06-16 21:34:43 -0500 | Rating Details | |
2023-06-16 20:08:38 -0500 | Rating Details | |
2023-06-16 20:01:32 -0500 | Rating Details | |
2023-06-16 19:51:28 -0500 | Rating Details | |
2023-06-16 19:33:27 -0500 | Rating Details | |
2023-06-19 19:54:49 -0500 | Rating Details |