Birdwatch Note
2023-06-16 18:47:21 UTC - MISINFORMED_OR_POTENTIALLY_MISLEADING
Não é correto afirmar que a "FDA admite eficácia negativa" depois de 90-179 dias. Os gráficos apenas indicam que após 90-179 dias não é possível afastar a hipótese nula, ou seja, as vacinas perderam eficácia. Nenhuma vacina tem "eficácia negativa". https://eme.cochrane.org/intervalos-de-confianca-o-que-e-e-como-interpreta-lo/
Written by 44AA956C80610B05EDEA00DBE14E3B24112D16C1E42B49DC0D8221A83D915854
Participant Details
Original Tweet
Tweet embedding is no longer reliably available, due to the platform's instability (in terms of both technology and policy). If the Tweet still exists, you can view it here: https://twitter.com/foo_bar/status/1669760050569641991
Please note, though, that you may need to have your own Twitter account to access that page. I am currently exploring options for archiving Tweet data in a post-API context.
All Information
- ID - 1669778709274918952
- noteId - 1669778709274918952
- participantId -
- noteAuthorParticipantId - 44AA956C80610B05EDEA00DBE14E3B24112D16C1E42B49DC0D8221A83D915854 Participant Details
- createdAtMillis - 1686941241939
- tweetId - 1669760050569641991
- classification - MISINFORMED_OR_POTENTIALLY_MISLEADING
- believable -
- harmful -
- validationDifficulty -
- misleadingOther - 0
- misleadingFactualError - 1
- misleadingManipulatedMedia - 0
- misleadingOutdatedInformation - 0
- misleadingMissingImportantContext - 1
- misleadingUnverifiedClaimAsFact - 0
- misleadingSatire - 0
- notMisleadingOther - 0
- notMisleadingFactuallyCorrect - 0
- notMisleadingOutdatedButNotWhenWritten - 0
- notMisleadingClearlySatire - 0
- notMisleadingPersonalOpinion - 0
- trustworthySources - 1
- summary
- Não é correto afirmar que a "FDA admite eficácia negativa" depois de 90-179 dias. Os gráficos apenas indicam que após 90-179 dias não é possível afastar a hipótese nula, ou seja, as vacinas perderam eficácia. Nenhuma vacina tem "eficácia negativa". https://eme.cochrane.org/intervalos-de-confianca-o-que-e-e-como-interpreta-lo/
Note Status History
| createdAt | timestampMillisOfFirstNonNMRStatus | firstNonNMRStatus | timestampMillisOfCurrentStatus | currentStatus | timestampMillisOfLatestNonNMRStatus | mostRecentNonNMRStatus | participantId |
| 2023-06-16 18:47:21 UTC (1686941241939) |
1969-12-31 23:59:59 UTC (-1) |
2023-06-19 02:10:03 UTC (1687140603698) |
NEEDS_MORE_RATINGS | 1969-12-31 23:59:59 UTC (-1) |
Note Ratings
| rated at | rated by | |
| 2023-06-17 18:22:47 -0500 | Rating Details | |
| 2023-06-17 16:23:28 -0500 | Rating Details | |
| 2023-06-17 11:47:56 -0500 | Rating Details | |
| 2023-06-17 06:42:36 -0500 | Rating Details | |
| 2023-06-17 01:03:53 -0500 | Rating Details | |
| 2023-06-16 22:23:44 -0500 | Rating Details | |
| 2023-06-16 21:12:01 -0500 | Rating Details | |
| 2023-06-16 21:05:20 -0500 | Rating Details | |
| 2023-06-16 19:59:56 -0500 | Rating Details | |
| 2023-06-16 18:40:26 -0500 | Rating Details | |
| 2023-06-16 17:21:33 -0500 | Rating Details | |
| 2023-06-16 17:16:30 -0500 | Rating Details | |
| 2023-06-16 16:49:28 -0500 | Rating Details | |
| 2023-06-16 16:42:16 -0500 | Rating Details | |
| 2023-06-16 16:31:22 -0500 | Rating Details | |
| 2023-06-16 14:31:48 -0500 | Rating Details | |
| 2023-06-16 14:23:57 -0500 | Rating Details | |
| 2023-06-16 14:23:00 -0500 | Rating Details |