Birdwatch Note
2023-06-16 09:51:53 UTC - MISINFORMED_OR_POTENTIALLY_MISLEADING
Hoewel het rapport van de OVV kritisch is op tal van punten , stelt de raad bv niet dat er geen enkele onderbouwing was voor invoering van de mondkapjesplicht. (p. 194) en al helemaal niet dat de massavaccinatiecampagne een slecht onderbouwd idee was. (p.134) https://www.onderzoeksraad.nl/nl/aanpak-coronacrisis-deel2
Written by 98F8CCD75EDDCADC834DCCA020B57F292F22DDD94B7210A59B053353925E47B8
Participant Details
Original Tweet
Tweet embedding is no longer reliably available, due to the platform's instability (in terms of both technology and policy). If the Tweet still exists, you can view it here: https://twitter.com/foo_bar/status/1669335889947021315
Please note, though, that you may need to have your own Twitter account to access that page. I am currently exploring options for archiving Tweet data in a post-API context.
All Information
- ID - 1669643952209776641
- noteId - 1669643952209776641
- participantId -
- noteAuthorParticipantId - 98F8CCD75EDDCADC834DCCA020B57F292F22DDD94B7210A59B053353925E47B8 Participant Details
- createdAtMillis - 1686909113349
- tweetId - 1669335889947021315
- classification - MISINFORMED_OR_POTENTIALLY_MISLEADING
- believable -
- harmful -
- validationDifficulty -
- misleadingOther - 0
- misleadingFactualError - 1
- misleadingManipulatedMedia - 0
- misleadingOutdatedInformation - 0
- misleadingMissingImportantContext - 1
- misleadingUnverifiedClaimAsFact - 1
- misleadingSatire - 0
- notMisleadingOther - 0
- notMisleadingFactuallyCorrect - 0
- notMisleadingOutdatedButNotWhenWritten - 0
- notMisleadingClearlySatire - 0
- notMisleadingPersonalOpinion - 0
- trustworthySources - 1
- summary
- Hoewel het rapport van de OVV kritisch is op tal van punten , stelt de raad bv niet dat er geen enkele onderbouwing was voor invoering van de mondkapjesplicht. (p. 194) en al helemaal niet dat de massavaccinatiecampagne een slecht onderbouwd idee was. (p.134) https://www.onderzoeksraad.nl/nl/aanpak-coronacrisis-deel2
Note Status History
| createdAt | timestampMillisOfFirstNonNMRStatus | firstNonNMRStatus | timestampMillisOfCurrentStatus | currentStatus | timestampMillisOfLatestNonNMRStatus | mostRecentNonNMRStatus | participantId |
| 2023-06-16 09:51:53 UTC (1686909113349) |
1969-12-31 23:59:59 UTC (-1) |
2023-06-19 02:10:03 UTC (1687140603698) |
NEEDS_MORE_RATINGS | 1969-12-31 23:59:59 UTC (-1) |
Note Ratings
| rated at | rated by | |
| 2023-06-18 12:46:04 -0500 | Rating Details | |
| 2023-06-18 09:41:02 -0500 | Rating Details | |
| 2023-06-17 12:37:39 -0500 | Rating Details | |
| 2023-06-16 12:29:25 -0500 | Rating Details | |
| 2023-06-16 12:08:10 -0500 | Rating Details | |
| 2023-06-16 12:07:49 -0500 | Rating Details | |
| 2023-06-16 11:49:28 -0500 | Rating Details | |
| 2023-06-16 11:31:03 -0500 | Rating Details | |
| 2023-06-16 11:27:28 -0500 | Rating Details | |
| 2023-06-16 11:21:52 -0500 | Rating Details | |
| 2023-06-16 11:21:28 -0500 | Rating Details | |
| 2023-06-16 11:16:12 -0500 | Rating Details | |
| 2023-06-16 11:09:58 -0500 | Rating Details | |
| 2023-06-16 10:33:05 -0500 | Rating Details | |
| 2023-06-16 10:32:48 -0500 | Rating Details | |
| 2023-06-16 10:15:55 -0500 | Rating Details | |
| 2023-06-16 10:06:38 -0500 | Rating Details | |
| 2023-06-16 10:05:59 -0500 | Rating Details | |
| 2023-06-16 09:59:50 -0500 | Rating Details | |
| 2023-06-16 09:56:12 -0500 | Rating Details | |
| 2023-06-16 09:44:00 -0500 | Rating Details | |
| 2023-06-16 09:26:40 -0500 | Rating Details | |
| 2023-06-16 08:33:56 -0500 | Rating Details | |
| 2023-06-16 07:12:54 -0500 | Rating Details | |
| 2023-06-16 06:24:40 -0500 | Rating Details | |
| 2023-06-16 05:50:42 -0500 | Rating Details | |
| 2023-06-16 05:41:56 -0500 | Rating Details | |
| 2023-06-16 05:34:57 -0500 | Rating Details | |
| 2023-06-16 05:33:21 -0500 | Rating Details | |
| 2023-06-16 05:14:56 -0500 | Rating Details |