Birdwatch Archive

Birdwatch Note

2023-06-16 05:31:11 UTC - NOT_MISLEADING

There was never a formal request for national guard troops made by donald trump. He talked about it, but never formally requested them. https://www.politifact.com/factchecks/2021/mar/02/donald-trump/no-proof-trump-requested-10000-guard-troops-jan-6-/ The rest of the tweet is personal opinion and not subject to community notes.

Written by 0BE88BCD4AC1F0567051522B082EB1B55C80AF027D3095D97680AD3D7A0D21ED
Participant Details

Original Tweet

Tweet embedding is no longer reliably available, due to the platform's instability (in terms of both technology and policy). If the Tweet still exists, you can view it here: https://twitter.com/foo_bar/status/1669437354250063877

Please note, though, that you may need to have your own Twitter account to access that page. I am currently exploring options for archiving Tweet data in a post-API context.

All Information

  • ID - 1669578347020447745
  • noteId - 1669578347020447745
  • participantId -
  • noteAuthorParticipantId - 0BE88BCD4AC1F0567051522B082EB1B55C80AF027D3095D97680AD3D7A0D21ED Participant Details
  • createdAtMillis - 1686893471855
  • tweetId - 1669437354250063877
  • classification - NOT_MISLEADING
  • believable -
  • harmful -
  • validationDifficulty -
  • misleadingOther - 0
  • misleadingFactualError - 0
  • misleadingManipulatedMedia - 0
  • misleadingOutdatedInformation - 0
  • misleadingMissingImportantContext - 0
  • misleadingUnverifiedClaimAsFact - 0
  • misleadingSatire - 0
  • notMisleadingOther - 0
  • notMisleadingFactuallyCorrect - 1
  • notMisleadingOutdatedButNotWhenWritten - 0
  • notMisleadingClearlySatire - 0
  • notMisleadingPersonalOpinion - 1
  • trustworthySources - 1
  • summary
    • There was never a formal request for national guard troops made by donald trump. He talked about it, but never formally requested them. https://www.politifact.com/factchecks/2021/mar/02/donald-trump/no-proof-trump-requested-10000-guard-troops-jan-6-/ The rest of the tweet is personal opinion and not subject to community notes.

Note Status History

createdAt timestampMillisOfFirstNonNMRStatus firstNonNMRStatus timestampMillisOfCurrentStatus currentStatus timestampMillisOfLatestNonNMRStatus mostRecentNonNMRStatus participantId
2023-06-16 05:31:11 UTC
(1686893471855)
1969-12-31 23:59:59 UTC
(-1)
2023-06-19 02:10:03 UTC
(1687140603698)
NEEDS_MORE_RATINGS 1969-12-31 23:59:59 UTC
(-1)

Note Ratings

rated at rated by
2023-06-17 00:33:45 -0500 Rating Details
2023-06-16 14:29:33 -0500 Rating Details
2023-06-16 13:21:50 -0500 Rating Details
2023-06-16 12:30:29 -0500 Rating Details
2023-06-16 12:25:17 -0500 Rating Details
2023-06-16 11:49:22 -0500 Rating Details
2023-06-16 11:25:35 -0500 Rating Details
2023-06-16 10:57:39 -0500 Rating Details
2023-06-16 10:37:18 -0500 Rating Details
2023-06-16 10:06:42 -0500 Rating Details
2023-06-16 09:11:19 -0500 Rating Details
2023-06-16 09:09:43 -0500 Rating Details
2023-06-16 08:54:52 -0500 Rating Details
2023-06-16 08:54:36 -0500 Rating Details
2023-06-16 08:46:48 -0500 Rating Details
2023-06-16 08:30:20 -0500 Rating Details
2023-06-16 08:07:44 -0500 Rating Details
2023-06-16 08:02:47 -0500 Rating Details
2023-06-16 07:49:22 -0500 Rating Details
2023-06-16 07:48:18 -0500 Rating Details
2023-06-16 07:47:13 -0500 Rating Details
2023-06-16 07:21:26 -0500 Rating Details
2023-06-16 06:29:16 -0500 Rating Details
2023-06-16 04:26:48 -0500 Rating Details
2023-06-16 04:10:09 -0500 Rating Details
2023-06-16 03:53:21 -0500 Rating Details
2023-06-16 03:30:34 -0500 Rating Details
2023-06-16 01:30:12 -0500 Rating Details
2023-06-16 01:13:47 -0500 Rating Details
2023-06-16 00:46:16 -0500 Rating Details
2023-06-16 00:35:27 -0500 Rating Details
2023-06-16 00:34:44 -0500 Rating Details