Birdwatch Archive

Birdwatch Note

2023-06-15 18:55:58 UTC - MISINFORMED_OR_POTENTIALLY_MISLEADING

This post infers that unborn babies are able to recognise faces. The actual study makes no such conclusion and instead refers to recognition of a pattern of dots directly projected into the womb that may represent facial structures. https://www.cell.com/current-biology/fulltext/S0960-9822(17)30580-8

Written by B723D8753A381ED9D4FBEB1F59044F9A1965DE30B25A31AF0BCB0A67144940B3
Participant Details

Original Tweet

Tweet embedding is no longer reliably available, due to the platform's instability (in terms of both technology and policy). If the Tweet still exists, you can view it here: https://twitter.com/foo_bar/status/1668247032815931394

Please note, though, that you may need to have your own Twitter account to access that page. I am currently exploring options for archiving Tweet data in a post-API context.

All Information

  • ID - 1669418489851912192
  • noteId - 1669418489851912192
  • participantId -
  • noteAuthorParticipantId - B723D8753A381ED9D4FBEB1F59044F9A1965DE30B25A31AF0BCB0A67144940B3 Participant Details
  • createdAtMillis - 1686855358933
  • tweetId - 1668247032815931394
  • classification - MISINFORMED_OR_POTENTIALLY_MISLEADING
  • believable -
  • harmful -
  • validationDifficulty -
  • misleadingOther - 0
  • misleadingFactualError - 1
  • misleadingManipulatedMedia - 0
  • misleadingOutdatedInformation - 0
  • misleadingMissingImportantContext - 1
  • misleadingUnverifiedClaimAsFact - 1
  • misleadingSatire - 0
  • notMisleadingOther - 0
  • notMisleadingFactuallyCorrect - 0
  • notMisleadingOutdatedButNotWhenWritten - 0
  • notMisleadingClearlySatire - 0
  • notMisleadingPersonalOpinion - 0
  • trustworthySources - 1
  • summary
    • This post infers that unborn babies are able to recognise faces. The actual study makes no such conclusion and instead refers to recognition of a pattern of dots directly projected into the womb that may represent facial structures. https://www.cell.com/current-biology/fulltext/S0960-9822(17)30580-8

Note Status History

createdAt timestampMillisOfFirstNonNMRStatus firstNonNMRStatus timestampMillisOfCurrentStatus currentStatus timestampMillisOfLatestNonNMRStatus mostRecentNonNMRStatus participantId
2023-06-15 18:55:58 UTC
(1686855358933)
1969-12-31 23:59:59 UTC
(-1)
2023-06-16 01:39:39 UTC
(1686879579658)
NEEDS_MORE_RATINGS 1969-12-31 23:59:59 UTC
(-1)

Note Ratings

rated at rated by
2023-06-15 18:41:28 -0500 Rating Details
2023-06-15 18:32:36 -0500 Rating Details
2023-06-15 18:32:19 -0500 Rating Details
2023-06-15 17:19:14 -0500 Rating Details
2023-06-15 16:21:43 -0500 Rating Details
2023-06-15 16:05:40 -0500 Rating Details
2023-06-15 15:25:07 -0500 Rating Details
2023-06-15 15:16:05 -0500 Rating Details
2023-06-15 15:15:38 -0500 Rating Details
2023-06-16 20:16:36 -0500 Rating Details
2023-06-16 16:20:20 -0500 Rating Details
2023-06-16 16:11:32 -0500 Rating Details
2023-06-16 16:09:07 -0500 Rating Details
2023-06-16 14:36:59 -0500 Rating Details
2023-06-16 14:25:10 -0500 Rating Details
2023-06-16 13:06:41 -0500 Rating Details
2023-06-16 10:43:35 -0500 Rating Details
2023-06-16 10:17:20 -0500 Rating Details
2023-06-16 01:43:00 -0500 Rating Details
2023-06-15 21:59:10 -0500 Rating Details
2023-06-15 21:58:54 -0500 Rating Details
2023-06-15 21:41:13 -0500 Rating Details
2023-06-15 20:58:51 -0500 Rating Details
2023-06-15 20:36:42 -0500 Rating Details